Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32741965›Full record

Observational studyGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

Tumor detection rates in screening of individuals with SDHx-related hereditary paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndrome.

Samantha E Greenberg, Michelle F Jacobs, Heather Wachtel, Amanda Anson, Luke Buchmann, Debbie L Cohen, Maria Bonanni, Bonita Bennett, Anne Naumer, Amanda M Schaefer and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Molecular Genetics of Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2024
    Article
  5. Management of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Update on the genetics of paragangliomas.Endocrine-related cancer · 2023
    Review
  8. UK recommendations forJournal of medical genetics · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha E Greenberg *Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Michelle F JacobsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Heather WachtelDepartment of Surgery, Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amanda AnsonHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Luke BuchmannHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Debbie L CohenDepartment of Medicine, Renal and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Maria BonanniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Human Genetics and Translational Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bonita BennettDepartment of Medicine, Renal and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anne NaumerHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Amanda M SchaeferDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Wendy KohlmannHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Katherine L NathansonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Human Genetics and Translational Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tobias Else *Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lauren Fishbein *Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes and Division of Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. Lauren.Fishbein@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8151-5107
University of Utah · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USTranslational Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR001879 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEAGHER, EMMA ANNE · 2016 to 2025
$13.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001879NCATS NIH HHS KL2-TR001879NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NCI NIH HHS P30CA042014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimal data exist regarding the efficacy of screening protocols for individuals with SDHx germline pathogenic variants with hereditary paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndrome. This study aimed to evaluate the SDHx-related tumor detection rate in individuals undergoing clinical screening protocols.

methodsA multicenter retrospective longitudinal observational study was conducted. Individuals with germline SDHx pathogenic variants underwent clinical whole-body imaging and biochemical testing.

resultsTwo hundred sixty-three individuals with SDHx germline pathogenic variants completed 491 imaging screens. Individuals with SDHB germline pathogenic variants were most common (n = 188/263, 72%), followed by SDHD (n = 35/263, 13%) and SDHC (n = 28/263, 11%). SDHx-related tumors were found in 17% (n = 45/263) of the cohort. Most SDHx-related tumors were identified on baseline imaging screen (n = 39/46, 85%). Individuals with SDHD pathogenic variants had the highest tumor detection rate (n = 14/35, 40%). Of imaging screens identifying SDHx-related paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma, 29% (n = 12/41) had negative biochemical testing. Secondary actionable findings were identified in 15% (n = 75/491) of imaging screens.

conclusionCurrent SDHx screening protocols are effective at identifying SDHx-related tumors. Tumor detection rates vary by SDHx gene and screening has the potential to uncover actionable secondary findings. Imaging is an essential part of the screening process as biochemical testing alone does not detect all disease.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsParagangliomaPheochromocytomaGerm-Line MutationHumansRetrospective StudiesSuccinate DehydrogenaseSuccinate Dehydrogenasecancer predispositionhereditary paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma syndromepheochromocytomascreeningsuccinate dehydrogenase subunit genes (SDHx)

Identifiers

PMID32741965
PMCPMC7710583
OpenAlexW3046517424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.