ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2020
Improved blind tracheal intubation in rats: a simple and secure approach.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury animal models using intraoperative neural monitoring: SD rat models.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- An Improved Rat Model of Myocardial Infarction Without Invasive Intubation.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful tracheal intubation is the prerequisite for open-chest models. Tracheal intubation in small animal such as the rat is often challenging due to the small size and special anatomy. We investigated whether endotracheal intubation can be performed safely and reliably in rats employing only gesture fixation and a catheter. Rats were randomly classified into three groups: Improved blind intubation (B group) was performed with gestures fixed intubation position. Transillumination intubation (T group) utilized light to locate the larynx. Incision intubation (I group) was intubated after trachea incision. The feasibility, difficulty, complications of the three groups were compared. B group was faster than the other two groups. Completion time of the operation was recorded as follows: B group: 35.00 ± 9.86 sec; T group: 57.12 ± 6.54 sec; I group: 184.33 ± 25.49 sec (P≤0.001). B group has fewer attempts than Group T (P=0.001). The operational success rates of all three groups (B group 14 (93.3%) vs. T group 12 (80.0%) vs. I group 13 (86.7%)) were similar (P>0.05). In terms of operation difficult and operational complications, the differences between the three groups were not significant. The rate of endometrial damage under microscope were no difference, too. The Improved blind endotracheal intubation is a simple method, with a comparable safety profile to that of the transillumination and incision intubaton.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.