Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32741754›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2020

Dynamic modulation of frontal theta power predicts cognitive ability in infancy.

Eleanor K Braithwaite, Emily J H Jones, Mark H Johnson, Karla Holmboe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Proactive or reactive? Neural oscillatory insight into the leader-follower dynamics of early infant-caregiver interaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor K BraithwaiteCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, United Kingdom.
Emily J H JonesCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, United Kingdom.
Mark H JohnsonCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Karla HolmboeDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: karla.holmboe@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Birkbeck, University of London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G9715587Medical Research Council MR/N008626/1Medical Research Council MR/T003057/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive ability is a key factor that contributes to individual differences in life trajectories. Identifying early neural indicators of later cognitive ability may enable us to better elucidate the mechanisms that shape individual differences, eventually aiding identification of infants with an elevated likelihood of less optimal outcomes. A previous study associated a measure of neural activity (theta EEG) recorded at 12-months with non-verbal cognitive ability at ages two, three and seven in individuals with older siblings with autism (Jones et al., 2020). In a pre-registered study (https://osf.io/v5xrw/), we replicate and extend this finding in a younger, low-risk infant sample. EEG was recorded during presentation of a non-social video to a cohort of 6-month-old infants and behavioural data was collected at 6- and 9-months-old. Initial analyses replicated the finding that frontal theta power increases over the course of video viewing, extending this to 6-month-olds. Further, individual differences in the magnitude of this change significantly predicted non-verbal cognitive ability measured at 9-months, but not early executive function. Theta change at 6-months-old may therefore be an early indicator of later cognitive ability. This could have important implications for identification of, and interventions for, children at risk of poor cognitive outcomes.

Indexed as

CognitionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansInfantMaleTheta RhythmCognitive developmentEEGExecutive functionFrontal theta oscillationsNeural correlateNon-verbal ability

Identifiers

PMID32741754
PMCPMC7393453
OpenAlexW2981384005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.