Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32741426›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2020

Evaluation of an ensemble-based distance statistic for clustering MLST datasets using epidemiologically defined clusters of cyclosporiasis.

Fernanda S Nascimento, Joel Barratt, Katelyn Houghton, Mateusz Plucinski, Julia Kelley, Shannon Casillas, Carolyne Cody Bennett, Cathy Snider, Rashmi Tuladhar, Jenny Zhang and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic characterization ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  13. Parasitology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Novel insights on the genetic population structure of human-infectingCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hastening Progress inMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Fernanda S NascimentoParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joel BarrattParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8711-2408
Katelyn HoughtonParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mateusz PlucinskiMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Julia KelleyMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Shannon CasillasParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Carolyne Cody BennettParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Cathy SniderTexas Department of State Health Services, TX, USA.
Rashmi TuladharTexas Department of State Health Services, TX, USA.
Jenny ZhangTexas Department of State Health Services, TX, USA.
Brooke ClemonsNew York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center Parasitology Laboratory, NY, USA.
Susan Madison-AntenucciNew York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center Parasitology Laboratory, NY, USA.
Alexis RussellNew York State Department of Health-Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, NY, USA.
Elizabeth CebelinskiMinnesota Department of Health, MN, USA.
Jisun HaanMinnesota Department of Health, MN, USA.
Trisha RobinsonMinnesota Department of Health, MN, USA.
Michael J ArrowoodWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eldin TalundzicMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Richard S BradburyParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yvonne QvarnstromParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9466-6414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outbreaks of cyclosporiasis, a food-borne illness caused by the coccidian parasite Cyclospora cayetanensis have increased in the USA in recent years, with approximately 2300 laboratory-confirmed cases reported in 2018. Genotyping tools are needed to inform epidemiological investigations, yet genotyping Cyclospora has proven challenging due to its sexual reproductive cycle which produces complex infections characterized by high genetic heterogeneity. We used targeted amplicon deep sequencing and a recently described ensemble-based distance statistic that accommodates heterogeneous (mixed) genotypes and specimens with partial genotyping data, to genotype and cluster 648 C. cayetanensis samples submitted to CDC in 2018. The performance of the ensemble was assessed by comparing ensemble-identified genetic clusters to analogous clusters identified independently based on common food exposures. Using these epidemiologic clusters as a gold standard, the ensemble facilitated genetic clustering with 93.8% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity. Hence, we anticipate that this procedure will greatly complement epidemiologic investigations of cyclosporiasis.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalCluster AnalysisCyclosporaCyclosporiasisDatabases, FactualFecesGenetic MarkersHaplotypesHumansMultilocus Sequence TypingGenetic MarkersclusteringCyclospora cayetanensiscyclosporiasisdeep sequencingdistance-statisticgenotypegenotypingmachine learningMLST

Identifiers

PMID32741426
PMCPMC7439293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.