Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32741366›Full record

ReviewBMC oral health2020

The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review.

Ioannis Papathanasiou, Phophi Kamposiora, George Papavasiliou, Marco Ferrari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC oral health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 258 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioannis PapathanasiouDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Phophi KamposioraDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. phophik@dent.uoa.gr.
George PapavasiliouDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Marco FerrariDepartment of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology led to the introduction of an increasing number of machinable materials suitable for dental prostheses. One of these materials is polyetheretherketone (PEEK), a high performance polymer recently used in dentistry with favorable physical, mechanical and chemical properties. The purpose of this study was to review the current published literature on the use of PEEK for the fabrication of dental prostheses with CAD-CAM techniques.

methodsElectronic database searches were performed using the terms "PEEK", "CAD-CAM", "dental", "dentistry" to identify studies related to the use of PEEK for the fabrication of CAD-CAM prostheses. The search period spanned from January 1990 through February 2020. Both in vivo and in vitro studies in English were eligible. Review articles and the references of the included publications were searched to identify relevant articles.

resultsA great number of in vitro studies are available in the current literature pointing out the noticeable properties of PEEK. The use of PEEK has been recommended for a wide range of CAD-CAM fabricated fixed and removable dental prostheses. PEEK was additionally recommended for occlusal splints, intra-radicular posts, implant abutments, customized healing abutments and provisional restorations. However, only a few clinical studies were identified.

conclusionsPEEK could be considered as a viable alternative for CAD-CAM fixed and removable dental prostheses to well-established dental materials. Due to the scarcity of clinical data, clinical trials are needed to assess the long-term performance of PEEK prostheses.

Indexed as

Dental Prosthesis DesignProsthodonticsBenzophenonesComputer-Aided DesignKetonesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersBenzophenonesKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersClinical applicationsComputer-assisted-design/ computer-assisted-manufacturingDental prosthesesDigital prosthodonticsPolyetheretherketone

Identifiers

PMID32741366
PMCPMC7398079
OpenAlexW3046717978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.