Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32741341›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2020

Developing a national health research agenda for Lao PDR: prioritising the research needs of stakeholders.

Dirk R Essink, Kethmany Ratsavong, Esmee Bally, Jessica Fraser, Sengdavy Xaypadith, Manithong Vonglokham, Jacqueline Ew Broerse, Sengchanh Kounnavong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dirk R EssinkFaculty of Science, Athena Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1050-4646
Kethmany RatsavongLao Tropical Institute and Public Health , Lao Peoples Democratic Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7075-2246
Esmee BallyFaculty of Science, Athena Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0179-7990
Jessica FraserFaculty of Science, Athena Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4745-6780
Sengdavy XaypadithDepartment of Health Professional Education, Ministry of Health , Vientiane Capital, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-2193-2443
Manithong VonglokhamLao Tropical Institute and Public Health , Lao Peoples Democratic Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3275-503X
Jacqueline Ew BroerseFaculty of Science, Athena Institute , Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8478-3422
Sengchanh KounnavongLao Tropical Institute and Public Health , Lao Peoples Democratic Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5766-5941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently the health research system in Lao PDR is fragmented and largely donor led. Capacity among national public health institutes is limited to select priority research questions for funding.

objectiveThe objective of this capacity building and practice-oriented study is to describe the process and outcome of the first National Health Research Agenda for Lao PDR and how the agenda contributes to institutional capacity of the Ministry of Health, in order to contribute to evidence-informed public health policy making.

methodThis activity used a mixed-methods approach. The overall design is based on principles of the interactive Learning and Action approach and consists out of 6 phases: (1) identification of needs, (2) shared analysis and integration, (3) nation-wide prioritization of research domains, (4) exploring specific research questions, (5) prioritization of research avenues, (6) dialogue and planning for action. The process involved interviews with experts in health policy and research (n = 42), telephone-based survey with district, provincial and national health staff (n = 135), a two-round Delphi consultation with experts in health policy and research (n = 33), and a workshop with policymakers, researchers, international organisations and civil society (n = 45) were held to gather data and conduct shared analysis.

results11 research domains were identified and prioritised: Health-seeking behaviour; Health system research; Health service provision; Mother and child health (MCH); Sexual & reproductive health; Health education; Non-communicable diseases (NCDs); Irrational drug use; Communicable diseases (CDs); Road traffic accidents; Mental health. Within these domains over 200 unique research questions were identified.

conclusionOur approach led to a comprehensive, inclusive, public health agenda for Lao PDR to realise better informed health policies. Questions on the agenda are action-oriented, originating in a desire to understand the problem so that immediate improvements can be made. The agenda is used within the MoH as a tool to fund and approve research.

Indexed as

Health PolicyBiomedical ResearchGovernment ProgramsHealth PrioritiesHumansLaosNational Health ProgramsOrganizational ObjectivesUnited StatesDelphi approachhealth policyLao People’s Democratic RepublicLEARN: Sexual Reproductive Health, ANC and Nutritionmixed methodsresearch needs

Identifiers

PMID32741341
PMCPMC7480602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.