Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32741245›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2020

Artificial intelligence approaches to predict coronary stenosis severity using non-invasive fractional flow reserve.

Jason M Carson, Neeraj Kavan Chakshu, Igor Sazonov, Perumal Nithiarasu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Patient-specificFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. A machine learning model for non-invasive detection of atherosclerotic coronary artery aneurysm.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. An AI based digital-twin for prioritising pneumonia patient treatment.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason M CarsonZienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6634-9123
Neeraj Kavan ChakshuZienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Igor SazonovZienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Perumal NithiarasuZienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Swansea University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S004076/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve is the current reference standard in the assessment of the functional impact of a stenosis in coronary heart disease. In this study, three models of artificial intelligence of varying degrees of complexity were compared to fractional flow reserve measurements. The three models are the multivariate polynomial regression, which is a statistical method used primarily for correlation; the feed-forward neural network; and the long short-term memory, which is a type of recurrent neural network that is suited to modelling sequences. The models were initially trained using a virtual patient database that was generated from a validated one-dimensional physics-based model. The feed-forward neural network performed the best for all test cases considered, which were a single vessel case from a virtual patient database, a multi-vessel network from a virtual patient database, and 25 clinically invasive fractional flow reserve measurements from real patients. The feed-forward neural network model achieved around 99% diagnostic accuracy in both tests involving virtual patients, and a respectable 72% diagnostic accuracy when compared to the invasive fractional flow reserve measurements. The multivariate polynomial regression model performed well in the single vessel case, but struggled on network cases as the variation of input features was much larger. The long short-term memory performed well for the single vessel cases, but tended to have a bias towards a positive fractional flow reserve prediction for the virtual multi-vessel case, and for the patient cases. Overall, the feed-forward neural network shows promise in successfully predicting fractional flow reserve in real patients, and could be a viable option if trained using a large enough data set of real patients.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsHumansArtificial intelligencebiomedical engineeringcomputational mechanicscoronary heart diseasefractional flow reservehaemodynamic modelling

Identifiers

PMID32741245
PMCPMC7675765
OpenAlexW3047451200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.