Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32741090›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2020

Deforming to Best Practice: Key considerations for deformable image registration in radiotherapy.

Jeffrey Barber, Johnson Yuen, Michael Jameson, Laurel Schmidt, Jonathan Sykes, Alison Gray, Nicholas Hardcastle, Callie Choong, Joel Poder, Amy Walker and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. First dosimetric evaluation of deformable dose accumulation in human individuals.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reirradiation: Evaluation of the occurrence and type in cancer treatment for lung - 2024.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Applicability and usage of dose mapping/accumulation in radiotherapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. ACPSEM position paper on the clinical implementation of image registration.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jeffrey BarberSydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Blacktown and Westmead, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-0970
Johnson YuenSt George Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0305-5360
Michael JamesonLiverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Laurel SchmidtSt George Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jonathan SykesSydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Blacktown and Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Alison GrayLiverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicholas HardcastlePeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-8472
Callie ChoongLiverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Joel PoderSt George Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Amy WalkerLiverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Adam YeoPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia.
Ben Archibald-HeerenICON Cancer Centre, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia.
Kristie HarrisonGenesisCare, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Annette HaworthInstitute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David ThwaitesSydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Blacktown and Westmead, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image registration is a process that underlies many new techniques in radiation oncology - from multimodal imaging and contour propagation in treatment planning to dose accumulation throughout treatment. Deformable image registration (DIR) is a subset of image registration subject to high levels of complexity in process and validation. A need for local guidance to assist in high-quality utilisation and best practice was identified within the Australian community, leading to collaborative activity and workshops. This report communicates the current limitations and best practice advice from early adopters to help guide those implementing DIR in the clinic at this early stage. They are based on the state of image registration applications in radiotherapy in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), and consensus discussions made at the 'Deforming to Best Practice' workshops in 2018. The current status of clinical application use cases is presented, including multimodal imaging, automatic segmentation, adaptive radiotherapy, retreatment, dose accumulation and response assessment, along with uptake, accuracy and limitations. Key areas of concern and preliminary suggestions for commissioning, quality assurance, education and training, and the use of automation are also reported. Many questions remain, and the radiotherapy community will benefit from continued research in this area. However, DIR is available to clinics and this report is intended to aid departments using or about to use DIR tools now.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy, Image-Guided

Identifiers

PMID32741090
PMCPMC7754021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.