Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32740838›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

The impact of particulate matter 2.5 on the risk of preeclampsia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hongbiao Yu, Yangxue Yin, Jiashuo Zhang, Rong Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Therapeutic nanoparticle safety in pregnancy: Bridging knowledge gaps with environmental insights and a translational roadmap.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A cohort study of the multipollutant effects of PMEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Personal exposure of PMEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Exposure toEnvironmental health perspectives · 2022
    Article
  16. Ambient air pollution and inflammatory effects in a Canadian pregnancy cohort.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongbiao YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University) of Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yangxue YinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University) of Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Jiashuo ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University) of Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Rong ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University) of Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. zhourong_hx@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4540-7336
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571465 & 81871175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing and inconsistent evidence of a linkage between maternal exposure to particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) and preeclampsia. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate this relationship. Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify articles published from inception to March 23, 2020, which showed a correlation between PM2.5 and preeclampsia. Finally, 9 of 523 initial studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. A random effect model was adopted to calculate the standardized odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Based on potential effect modification, subgroup analyses were further performed. Meta-analysis showed that maternal exposure to PM2.5 (per 10 μg/m

Indexed as

Pre-EclampsiaAir PollutantsAir PollutionFemaleHumansMaternal ExposureOdds RatioParticulate MatterPregnancyAir PollutantsParticulate MatterMeta-analysisParticular matter 2.5 (PM2.5)PreeclampsiaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32740838
PMCPMC7496023
OpenAlexW3046230782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.