ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2020
Infusion Therapies for Parkinson's Disease.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Invasive therapies for Parkinson's disease: an adapted excerpt from the guidelines of the German Society of Neurology.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Current and novel infusion therapies for patients with Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2023Review
- Advances in the Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Management of Non-motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease: An Update Since 2017.Current neuropharmacology · 2023Review
- Long-term effects of intrajejunal levodopa infusion on sleep in people with advanced Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Toward objective monitoring of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms using a wearable device: wearability and performance evaluation of PDMonitorFrontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence applications and robotic systems in Parkinson's disease (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- An update on advanced therapies for Parkinson's disease: From gene therapy to neuromodulation.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Personalised Advanced Therapies in Parkinson's Disease: The Role of Non-Motor Symptoms Profile.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Long-term effect of apomorphine infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease: a real-life study.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2021Article
- Practical value analysis of nursing risk management in intravenous drug allocation.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Bringing Advanced Therapies for Parkinson's Disease to the Clinic: An Analysis of Ethical Issues.Journal of Parkinson's diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAdvanced Parkinson's disease (APD) is marked by significant motor and non-motor complications affecting the patient's quality of life. Optimization of standard oral therapies (SOT) at some point fails to provide adequate relief. Among the available device-aided therapies, infusion therapies (IT) work on the rationale that continuous striatal dopaminergic stimulation can significantly reduce the motor fluctuations and smoothen the treatment response. This review serves to familiarize readers with available IT for APD with a focus on motor and non-motor effects, and safety. RECENT
findingsSeveral recent longitudinal studies have demonstrated a reduction in OFF and an equivalent increase in ON time with the use of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion (LCIG). Additionally, the benefit is noted on dyskinesia and non-motor symptoms. Similarly, backed by long-term clinical experience and open-label studies, a recent double-blind trial validates the efficacy of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI). Both IT are accompanied by a high rate of mild to moderate adverse events (AE) that can influence patient selection and clinical utility. While device and procedure-related AE are common for LCIG, infusion site reactions dominate the CSAI AE. IT are a viable and superior alternative for APD over SOT. Both therapies provide meaningful improvement of the motor fluctuations with a positive impact on the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.