Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32740741›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2020

Guidelines on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Imaging: 2020 Focused Update.

Enrico Borrelli, Mariacristina Parravano, Riccardo Sacconi, Eliana Costanzo, Lea Querques, Giovanna Vella, Francesco Bandello, Giuseppe Querques

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Choriocapillaris in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diabetic macular ischemia.Acta diabetologica · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Enrico BorrelliOphthalmology Department, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Mariacristina ParravanoIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo SacconiOphthalmology Department, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Eliana CostanzoIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Lea QuerquesOphthalmology Department, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna VellaOphthalmology Department, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BandelloOphthalmology Department, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe QuerquesOphthalmology Department, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy. giuseppe.querques@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3292-9581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has significantly expanded our knowledge of the ocular vasculature. In this review, we provide a discussion of the fundamental principles of OCTA and the application of this imaging modality to study the retinal and choroidal vessels. These guidelines are focused on 2020, and include updates since the 2019 publication. Importantly, we will comment on recent findings on OCTA technology with a special focus on the three-dimensional (3D) OCTA visualization.

Indexed as

ChoriocapillarisChoroidImage analysisOptical coherence tomography angiographyRetinal vesselsThree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID32740741
PMCPMC7708612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.