ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2020
Distribution of
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implantable ocular therapeutic systems: an insight into their clinical potential in the long-term treatment of ocular diseases.Biofabrication · 2026Review
- Innovative Applications of Nanomaterials in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ocular Diseases: Targeted Delivery, Intelligent Therapy, Diagnostic Breakthroughs, and Synergistic Strategies with Stem Cells and Biomaterials.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- The Effect of Preoperative Use of High- vs. Low-PAP-Inducing-Potential FP Agonists on the Surgical Outcomes of Trabeculectomy and AGV Implantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Protein and polypeptide mediated delivery to the eye.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo qualitatively evaluate the ocular and periocular distribution of
methodsIn the dog study, three animals received an intracameral dose of
resultsAfter intracameral dosing in dogs, radioactivity was concentrated in the cornea, iris, ciliary body, and anterior chamber with no radioactivity detected in the eyelids or other periorbital tissues. After topical dosing, radioactivity was distributed in the bulbar conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber, iris, ciliary body, upper and lower eyelids, and periorbital tissues (fat/muscle). After intracameral dosing in monkeys, radioactivity was concentrated in the anterior chamber, cornea, iris, ciliary body, and posteriorly along the uveoscleral outflow pathway; there was no radioactivity in the eyelids or periorbital tissues aside from signal in the nasolacrimal duct, likely from reflux of
conclusionsIntracameral delivery resulted in more selective target tissue drug exposure. Intracameral drug delivery has potential to reduce ocular surface and periocular adverse effects associated with topical administration of prostaglandin analogues, such as eyelash growth and periorbital fat atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.