Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32740705›Full record

ReviewEcotoxicology (London, England)2020

The use of epilithic biofilms as bioaccumulators of pesticides and pharmaceuticals in aquatic environments.

Gracieli Fernandes, Marília Camotti Bastos, Jocelina Paranhos Rosa de Vargas, Thibaut Le Guet, Barbara Clasen, Danilo Rheinheimer Dos Santos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. An Urban Stormwater Contaminant Signature: Defining Priority Contaminants for Urban Stormwater Research.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gracieli FernandesCentro de Ciências Rurais, Departamento de Solos, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Avenida Roraima, 1000, Bairro Camobi, CEP 97105-900, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Marília Camotti BastosUniversité de Limoges, PEREINE-EAU EA 7500, Limoges, France.
Jocelina Paranhos Rosa de VargasCentro de Ciências Rurais, Departamento de Solos, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Avenida Roraima, 1000, Bairro Camobi, CEP 97105-900, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Thibaut Le GuetUniversité de Limoges, PEREINE-EAU EA 7500, Limoges, France.
Barbara ClasenUniversidade Estadual do Rio Grande do Sul, Três Passos, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. ba.clasen@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1017-4402
Danilo Rheinheimer Dos SantosCentro de Ciências Rurais, Departamento de Solos, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Avenida Roraima, 1000, Bairro Camobi, CEP 97105-900, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversité de Limoges · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are a consortium of communities of organisms that live in syntrophic relationships and present a higher organization level than that of individual cells. Biofilms dominate microbial life in streams and rivers, enable crucial ecosystem processes, contribute to global biogeochemical flows and represent the main active bacterial life form. Epilithic biofilms are the main biomass found in rivers; their exposure to contaminants can lead to changes in their structure and composition. The composition of these communities is influenced by physicochemical factors, temperature, light and prior exposure to pollutants, among other factors, and it can be used for water quality monitoring purposes. The heterogenous composition of biofilms enables them to accumulate compounds in an integrative manner. Moreover, the availability of several sorption sites and their likely saturation can contribute to bioaccumulation. In aquatic environments, biofilms are also susceptible to the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes and participate in their dissemination. Anthropic pressure intensification processes continuously expose water resources and, consequently, biofilm communities to different contamination sources. Therefore, the use of biofilms to indicate environmental pollution is reinforced by the progress of studies on the subject. Biofilm communities' response to pollutants in aquatic environments can be mainly influenced by the presence of different organisms, which may change due to community development or age. The current research aims to review studies about biofilm contamination and highlight the importance of biofilm use to better evaluate and maintain the quality of water bodies.

Indexed as

BiofilmsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEcosystemPesticidesPharmaceutical PreparationsWater Pollutants, ChemicalPesticidesPharmaceutical PreparationsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnthropic activitiesBacterial resistanceBiofilm communitiesContaminantsEnvironmental monitoring

Identifiers

PMID32740705
OpenAlexW3046524929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.