Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32740702›Full record

Observational studyActa diabetologica2020

Adherence to a follow-up program after gestational diabetes.

Maria Grazia Dalfrà, Silvia Burlina, Gloria Giovanna Del Vescovo, Francesca Anti, Annunziata Lapolla

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta diabetologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gestational Diabetes and International Migration.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Grazia DalfràDiabetology and Dietetics Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Silvia BurlinaDiabetology and Dietetics Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Gloria Giovanna Del VescovoDiabetology and Dietetics Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Francesca AntiDiabetology and Dietetics Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Annunziata LapollaDiabetology and Dietetics Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. annunziata.lapolla@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9207-7704
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to examine attendance for early postpartum follow-up among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to identify factors that influenced their likelihood of attending.

methodsOne thousand eight hundred and nineteen women with GDM were retrospectively analyzed. During pregnancy, the following data were collected: age, family history of diabetes, ethnicity, prepregnancy BMI, fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, gestational week of GDM diagnosis, timing and mode of delivery, newborn's birth weight and length. Glycemia and insulinemia during OGTT, lipid profile and postpartum BMI were assessed at follow-up. Based on the OGTT, women were classified as having normal glucose tolerance (NGT) or abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT), which included impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), IFG + IGT, and DM2. Factors predicting postpartum attendance for follow-up and onset of AGT were considered.

resultsOf the 889 (48.9%) who attended the scheduled postpartum OGTT, 741 (83.4%) had NGT, while 148 (16.6%) had AGT (IFG 6.7%, IGT 7.7%, IFG + IGT 0.8%, DM2 1.5%). The predictors of adherence to follow-up were: not belonging to an immigrant group; family history of DM2; and insulin therapy in pregnancy. The same factors were also predictive of AGT. Our data suggest a role of ethnicity in both attendance for postpartum follow-up and its outcome.

conclusionDespite efforts to provide care for women with GDM, postpartum screening rates are still low among Italian women, and especially among immigrants. Hence, the need to improve these patients' awareness of the severe risk of developing diabetes after pregnancy, concentrating efforts especially on women belonging to the most at risk ethnic groups.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodPreventive Health ServicesAdultAftercareBlood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucose IntoleranceGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPatient CompliancePrediabetic StatePregnancyRetrospective StudiesBlood GlucoseAdherence to follow-upFetal outcomesGestational diabetes mellitusMaternal outcomesPostpartum follow-up

Identifiers

PMID32740702
OpenAlexW3046649340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.