ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2020
Development of prognostic model for patients at CKD stage 3a and 3b in South Central China using computational intelligence.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in predicting chronic kidney disease prognosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2024Pooled it
- Representation of multimorbidity and frailty in the development and validation of kidney failure prognostic prediction models: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review.Journal of nephrology · 2023Pooled it
- Machine learning algorithms' accuracy in predicting kidney disease progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Pooled it
- Risk prediction of the progression of chronic kidney disease stage 1 based on peripheral blood samples: construction and internal validation of a nomogram.Renal failure · 2023Trial
- Variational quantum classifier-based early identification and classification of chronic kidney disease using sparse autoencoder and LASSO shrinkage.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Association of peripheral eosinophil count with chronic kidney disease progression risk: a retrospective cohort study in Chinese population.Renal failure · 2024Observational
- Machine learning models to predict end-stage kidney disease in chronic kidney disease stage 4.BMC nephrology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3 was divided into two subgroups by eGFR (45 mL/ min 1.73 m
methodsWe used a computational intelligence model (CKD stage 3 Modeling, CSM) to distinguish CKD stage 3 with CKD stage 3a/3b by data distribution rules, pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), spearman correlation (SCC) analysis, logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and neural network (Nnet) to develop Prognostic Model for patients with CKD stage 3a/3b in South Central China. Furthermore, we used RF to discover risk factors of progression of CKD stage 3a and 3b to CKD stage 5. 1090 cases of CKD stage 3 patients in Xiangya Hospital were collected. Among them, 455 patients progressed to CKD stage 5 in a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR 4.295, 4.489).
resultsWe found that the common risk factors for progression of CKD stage 3a/3b to CKD stage 5 included albumin, creatinine, total protein, etc. Proteinuria, direct bilirubin, hemoglobin, etc. accounted for the progression from stage CKD stage 3a to stage 5. The risk factors for CKD stage 3b progression to stage 5 included low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes, eosinophil percentage, etc.
conclusionsCSM could be used as a point-of-care test to screen patients at high risk for disease progression, might allowing individualized therapeutic management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.