SynthesisPituitary2020
Granular cell tumors of the sellar region: what should be done after subtotal resection? A systematic review.
Synthesis in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A rare case of intramuscular granular cell tumor in the right thigh: case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Endoscopic endonasal resection of neurohypophyseal granular cell tumor: a case report and review of 88 published cases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Clinical characteristics and surgical approach for pituitary granular cell tumors: a case series of six patients and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Treatment modalities and outcomes of granular cell tumors and spindle cell oncocytomas of the pituitary gland: an analysis of two national cancer databases.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Supra-sellar granular cell tumor: Report of a case with literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGranular cell tumors (GCT) are highly vascularized and adherent to adjacent structures, and so, complete resection represents a challenge. Adjuvant therapy decisions for residual GCTs currently relies on individual clinician decisions due to a paucity of systematic literature data. We present a comprehensive analysis about the impact of adjuvant therapy in reported cases of patients with incomplete GCT resection.
methodsOne database (PubMed) and crossed references were queried for GCT with incomplete resection or biopsy from 1962 to 2020. Literature review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Also, two patients with residual GCT from our institutions are added to the analysis. Data regarding clinical presentation, surgical approach, use of adjuvant therapy, Ki-67 labeling, and follow up assessments were extracted and analyzed from selected publications.
resultsThirty-three studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria and 53 patients were selected (including our two reported cases). The median of age was 49 [IQR, 39-60 years], with a slight male predominance (1.2:1). Among the surgical procedures, seven (13%) were biopsies alone. Adjuvant therapy was used in 18 patients (radiotherapy, 94.5%; chemotherapy, 5.5%) but there is no statistical correlation with adjuvant therapy and the progression of the remnant tumor (p = 0.33). Our institutions' patients did not receive adjuvant therapy and did not show tumor progression on MRI.
conclusionOur systematic literature review suggests there is a limited role for chemo and/or radiotherapy in the management of incomplete GCT resection. It may be reasonable recommending close clinical follow up in patients with incomplete resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.