ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2021
Correlations among chronological age, cervical vertebral maturation index, and Demirjian developmental stage of the maxillary and mandibular canines and second molars.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiographic choice for skeletal maturation assessment: a systematic review of Cervical Vertebrae Method and Middle Phalanx Method.Oral radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy and Reliability of Dental Age Estimation Methods in Iranian Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2026Pooled it
- Chronological age range estimation of cervical vertebral maturation using Baccetti method: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthodontics · 2022Pooled it
- Is there a correlation between dental and cervical vertebrae maturation stages in growing subjects? A systematic review with meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Pooled it
- Lateral Cephalometric Radiography: Principles, Common Positioning Errors, and AI-Driven Quality Control.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Feasibility Study on Optimising the Efficacy of a Population Age Estimation Model for South China by Combined Machine Learning for the Second and Third Molars.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Bone age and dental age to assess criminal responsibility: Part I.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy of the combination of myofunctional therapy (lip exercises) and activator high-pull headgear in the closure of interlabial gap in long-face skeletal class II patients with lip incompetence: A 6-8-month longitudinal randomized clinical trial.Dental research journal · 2024Article
- Radiological Evaluation of the Accuracy of Demirjian, Nolla, and Willems Methods for Dental Age Estimation in 3-17-Year-Old Iranian Children.BioMed research international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEstimation of growth spurt from chronological age or dental development is of clinical interest to orthodontists. Since results in this regard are highly controversial and limited, this study was conducted to investigate associations among chronological age, skeletal development (cervical vertebral maturity [CVM]), and dental calcification (Demirjian) in girls and boys, independently.
methodsPanoramic radiographs and lateral cephalographs of 112 boys and 112 girls were evaluated. Demirjian stages of dental development of the bimaxillary canines and second molars were determined. CVM stages of skeletal growth were as well estimated. Correlations among these were assessed. Differences between sexes and between maxilla/mandible arches were assessed. Cutoff points in Demirjian and chronological age reflecting skeletal growth spurt were found using receiver operator characteristic curve (α = 0.05, β = 0.9 separately for girls and boys). RESULTS AND
conclusionsSex dimorphism existed both in CVM index and in Demirjian indexes. Compared to dental development and calcification, chronological age was the best predictor of skeletal growth and maturation. In estimating chronological age by radiography means, in girls, Demirjian method was better than CVM. In boys, Demirjian was better than CVM in the case of the molars but not canines. The cutoff points estimated for chronological age and dental calcification that can reflect skeletal growth spurt (between CS-3-and-CS-4) were as follows: in boys, age of 12 years; in girls, age between 11 and 12 years; the upper and lower canines: between G and H; the maxillary and mandibular second molars: between F and G; in the case of all teeth: between F and G.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.