Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32740646›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Prognostic Implications of Novel Gene Signatures in Gastric Cancer Microenvironment.

Mengyu Sun, Jieping Qiu, Huazheng Zhai, Yaoqun Wang, Panpan Ma, Mengyin Li, Bo Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genes · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multimerin-1 and cancer: a review.Bioscience reports · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mengyu SunDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Jieping QiuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Huazheng ZhaiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Yaoqun WangDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Panpan MaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Mengyin LiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Bo ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Increasing studies have shown the important clinical role of immune and stromal cells in gastric cancer microenvironment. Based on information of immune and stromal cells in The Cancer Genome Atlas, this study aimed to construct a prognostic risk assessment model for gastric cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Based on the immune/structural scores, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were filtered and analyzed. Afterwards, DEGs associated with prognosis were screened and the risk assessment model was constructed in the training set. Moreover, the validity of the model was verified both in the testing set and the overall sample. RESULTS In this study, patients were divided into high-score and low-score groups based on immune/stromal score, and 919 DEGs were identified. By applying least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox analysis, 10 mRNAs were selected to form a prognostic risk assessment model, risk score=(0.294*SLC17A9) + (-0.477*FERMT3) + (0.866*NRP1) + (0.350*MMRN1) + (0.381*RNASE1) + (0.189*TRIB3) + (0.230*PGAP3) + (0.087*MAGEA3) + (0.182*TACR2) + (0.368*CYP51A1). In the training set, the low-risk group divided by the model was found to have better overall survival, and the prediction efficiency of the model was demonstrated to be good. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that the model could work as a prognostic factor independently. Similar results were shown in the testing group and overall patients cohort group. Finally, the risk assessment model and other clinical variables were integrated to construct a nomogram. CONCLUSIONS In general, this study constructs a prognostic risk assessment model for gastric cancer, which could improve the prognosis stratification of patients combined with other clinical indicators.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdenocarcinomaAgedArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansImmunity, InnateMaleMiddle AgedModels, GeneticNeoplasm ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID32740646
PMCPMC7418782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.