Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32740306›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Integration of Person-Centered Narratives Into the Electronic Health Record: Study Protocol.

Heather Coats, Nadia Shive, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Sarah J Schmiege

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Essential Versus Nonessential: The Ethics of Conducting Non-COVID Research in a Population of Persons Living With Serious Illness During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2022
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather CoatsHeather Coats, PhD, APRN-BC, is Assistant Professor of Research, College of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. Nadia Shive, BA, CCRC, is Professional Research Assistant, College of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. Ardith Z. Doorenbos, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Nursing Collegiate Professor, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, and Director of Palliative Care and Co-leader of Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago. Sarah Schmiege, PhD, is Biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Nadia Shive
Ardith Z Doorenbos
Sarah J Schmiege

Funding

Applying Technology to Problems in Pain and Symptom ManagementK24NR015340 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOORENBOS, ARDITH Z · 2014 to 2018
$842k
Personalized experiences to inform improved communication for minorities with Life Limiting Illness (LLI)R00NR016686 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI COATS, HEATHER L · 2019 to 2021
$737k
NINR NIH HHS K24 NR015340NINR NIH HHS R00 NR016686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncorporating a patient's personal narrative into the electronic health record is an opportunity to more fully integrate the patient's values and beliefs into care, thus creating opportunities to deliver high-quality/high-value, person-centered care.

objectivesThe aim of the study was to present a study protocol of a narrative intervention to (a) compare the effects of the narrative intervention to usual care on primary outcome of person's (patient) perceptions of quality of communication, (b) compare the effects of the narrative intervention on secondary outcomes of biopsychosocial well-being, and (c) examine the feasibility and acceptability of the narrative intervention from the perspective of both persons: the patient and the acute care bedside nurse.

methodsA randomized control trial is being conducted with a targeted enrollment of 80 patient participants and 80 nurse participants. The patient participants include individuals who are admitted to the acute care hospital for either heart failure or end-stage renal disease. An acute care beside nurse who has cared for the patient participant is also enrolled. Through a 1:1 random allocation scheme, stratified by illness, we will enroll 40 in the narrative intervention group and 40 in the usual care group. Patient participants will be assessed for patient-reported outcomes of patient's perception of quality of communication and biopsychosocial well-being.

resultsThe study began in October 2019; 53 potential patient participants have been approached, 21 have enrolled, and 20 have completed the data collection process. DISCUSSION: The testing and integration of a person-centered narrative into the electronic health record is a novel approach to provide opportunities for improvement in communication between patients and nurses. The results from this study will provide important preliminary knowledge to inform future randomized clinical trials of narrative interventions leading to advances in how to best provide high-value, high-quality, person-centered care for persons living with serious illness.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNarrationPatient ParticipationHealth LiteracyHumansPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID32740306
PMCPMC9766876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.