ReviewCurrent opinion in nephrology and hypertension2020
Direct oral anticoagulants in chronic kidney disease: an update.
Review in Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of novel anticoagulant therapies in patients with chronic kidney disease-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- Population Pharmacokinetic Models for Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Clinical Appraisal Using Exposure Simulation.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Pooled it
- Access to renal function information to improve pharmaceutical care in direct oral anticoagulant users: a cluster randomized trial protocol.BMC primary care · 2026Trial
- Anticoagulants, Their Laboratory Monitoring, and Reversal.Hematology reports · 2026Review
- Oral anticoagulant prescribing and DOAC dosing appropriateness in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study from Vietnam.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Bleeding risk of rivaroxaban and edoxaban with and without amiodarone in atrial fibrillation patients: a prospective cohort study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Are the Direct Oral Anticoagulants Better Than Warfarin for the Prevention and Treatment of Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation?Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026Review
- Comparison of Apixaban With Warfarin in Patients on Dialysis Within an Integrated Health Care System.The Permanente journal · 2025Article
- predicTTE: An accessible and optimal tool for time-to-event prediction in neurological diseases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Anticoagulation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.American journal of nephrology · 2024Review
- Impact of renal function variability on long-term prognosis in ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Direct oral anticoagulants: the safer choice in chronic kidney disease?Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Use Among Hemodialysis Patients in the United States Without Medicare.Kidney medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Eligibility for pharmacological therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: implications of the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate.European journal of heart failure · 2022Article
- Editorial: Management of cardiovascular risk factors and other comorbidities in chronic kidney disease.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are variably eliminated by the kidneys rendering their use potentially problematic in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or necessitating appropriate dose adjustment. RECENT
findingsBoth observational and limited randomized trial data for DOACs compared with no treatment or with warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation on maintenance dialysis were recently published. In a randomized trial in patients on hemodialysis, there was no significant difference in vascular calcification between patients who received rivaroxaban with or without vitamin K2 or vitamin K antagonists. A randomized trial of apixaban versus warfarin was terminated owing to poor enrollment and preliminary results identified no difference in clinical outcomes between groups. However, valuable pharmacodynamic data will be forthcoming from that trial. In observational research, among patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, there were opposing trends in the associations of apixaban initiation versus no oral anticoagulation with ischemic versus hemorrhagic stroke and no association was present with the overall risk of stroke or embolism. In another study comparing apixaban with warfarin initiation, apixaban was associated with less bleeding. Regular-dose apixaban (5 mg twice daily) associated with reduced rates of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, whereas no such association was present for those prescribed the reduced dose (2.5 mg twice daily). SUMMARY: DOACs may be used after appropriate dose adjustment for an established clinical indication in patients with advanced CKD. Quality evidence for oral anticoagulation, with any specific agent or dose, for stroke prevention in hemodialysis continues to be lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.