Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32740092›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in oncology2020

Advances in immunotherapy for cervical cancer.

R Wendel Naumann, Charles A Leath

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A Novel Immune-Related Signature to Predict Prognosis and Immune Infiltration of Cervical Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R Wendel NaumannLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Charles A LeathUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Levine Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Treatment of HIV- and HIV+ Patients with HPV16+ CIN2/3 Using pNGLV4a-hCRTE6E7L2 DNA vaccine administered intramuscularly via electroporationP50CA098252 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TZYY-CHOOU WU · 2003 to 2026
$53.5M
NCTN Deep South Research ConsortiumUG1CA233330 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Charles A. Leath, Andrew M McDonald · 2019 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098252NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewNovel therapies are needed for the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer. The best chemotherapy regimen to date has a response rate of 48% with an overall survival of 17 months, with limited options for second-line chemotherapy. Immunotherapy can induce a strong immune response in cervical cancer due to retained viral antigens and is reviewed in this article. RECENT

findingsCurrent clinical trials include treatment with Listeria that elicits an immune response against the E7 oncoprotein and active vaccines against the E7 oncoprotein. Although the response rates to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibition alone have been modest, the landmark survival reported in these trials suggests the activity of these agents may not be measured by RECIST criteria. The KEYNOTE-158 trial has led to the approval of pembrolizumab in recurrent programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive cervical cancer. Combinations of programmed cell death 1 and anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors (CTLA4) inhibitors have shown promising and durable activity. There is active research with new combinations of checkpoint inhibitors, as well as combinations of these drugs with chemotherapy and radiation, and other novel approaches. SUMMARY: Immune therapy has broad activity in cervical cancer. Responses to immunotherapy can be dramatic and durable. Continued work to find the optimal combination and setting for immunotherapy is ongoing.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCancer VaccinesClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFemaleHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPapillomavirus VaccinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCancer VaccinesPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID32740092
PMCPMC7748319
OpenAlexW3046253990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.