Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32739962›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesia and analgesia2020

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Pain After Cesarean Delivery in a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

Srdjan S Nedeljkovic, Attila Kett, Manuel C Vallejo, Jean-Louis Horn, Brendan Carvalho, Xiaodong Bao, Naida M Cole, Leslie Renfro, Jeffrey C Gadsden, Jia Song and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03176459 phase4completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of EXPAREL When Administered Via Infiltration Into the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Versus Bupivacaine Alone in Subjects Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section

TypeinterventionalSponsorPacira Pharmaceuticals, IncRan2017 to 2018Enrolled186ConditionsC-Section, Pain ManagementArmsExparel + Bupivacaine, Bupivacaine
NCT07689162 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine for Post-Rhinoplasty Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2026 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmsStandard Bupivacaine, Liposomal Bupivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Srdjan S NedeljkovicFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Attila KettDepartment of Anesthesiology, Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Manuel C VallejoDepartment of Anesthesiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Jean-Louis HornDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Brendan CarvalhoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Xiaodong BaoDepartment of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Naida M ColeFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Leslie RenfroDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Jeffrey C GadsdenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jia Song**Pacira BioSciences, Inc, Parsippany, New Jersey.
Julia Yang**Pacira BioSciences, Inc, Parsippany, New Jersey.
Ashraf S HabibDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · USStanford University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USSaint Peter's University Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with bupivacaine hydrochloride (HCl) may not improve postsurgical analgesia. This lack of benefit could be related to the short duration of action of bupivacaine HCl. A retrospective study reported that TAP block with long-acting liposomal bupivacaine (LB) reduced opioid consumption and improved analgesia following cesarean delivery. Therefore, we performed a prospective multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial examining efficacy and safety of TAP block with LB plus bupivacaine HCl versus bupivacaine HCl alone.

methodsWomen (n = 186) with term pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to TAP block with LB 266 mg plus bupivacaine HCl 50 mg or bupivacaine HCl 50 mg alone. Efficacy was evaluated in a protocol-compliant analysis (PCA) set that was defined a priori. The primary end point was total postsurgical opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalent dosing [MED]) through 72 hours. Pain intensity was measured using a visual analog scale. Adverse events (AEs) after treatment were recorded through day 14.

resultsTotal opioid consumption through 72 hours was reduced with LB plus bupivacaine HCl versus bupivacaine HCl alone (least squares mean [LSM] [standard error (SE)] MED, 15.5 mg [6.67 mg] vs 32.0 mg [6.25 mg]). This corresponded to an LSM treatment difference of -16.5 mg (95% confidence interval [CI], -30.8 to -2.2 mg; P = .012). The area under the curve of imputed pain intensity scores through 72 hours supported noninferiority of LB plus bupivacaine HCl versus bupivacaine HCl alone (LSM [SE], 147.9 [21.13] vs 178.5 [19.78]; LSM treatment difference, -30.6; 95% CI, -75.9 to 14.7), with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 36 (P = .002). In an analysis of all treated patients, including those not meeting criteria for inclusion in the PCA, there was no difference in postsurgical opioid consumption between groups. In the LB plus bupivacaine HCl group, 63.6% of patients experienced an AE after treatment versus 56.2% in the bupivacaine HCl-alone group. Serious AEs after treatment were rare (≈3% in both groups).

conclusionsTAP block using LB plus bupivacaine HCl as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol incorporating intrathecal morphine resulted in reduced opioid consumption after cesarean delivery in the PCA set. Results suggest that with correct TAP block placement and adherence to a multimodal postsurgical analgesic regimen, there is an opioid-reducing benefit of adding LB to bupivacaine TAP blocks after cesarean delivery (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03176459).

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesAdultAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineCesarean SectionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLiposomesMiddle AgedNerve BlockPostoperative PainPregnancyAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID32739962
PMCPMC7643795
OpenAlexW3046448895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.