Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32739863›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2020

A radiomics model for preoperative prediction of brain invasion in meningioma non-invasively based on MRI: A multicentre study.

Jing Zhang, Kuan Yao, Panpan Liu, Zhenyu Liu, Tao Han, Zhiyong Zhao, Yuntai Cao, Guojin Zhang, Junting Zhang, Jie Tian and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Can brain-to-tumour outer interface radiomics improve the efficiency of MRI in predicting the brain invasion of meningiomas?Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advancements in the application of MRI radiomics in meningioma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Preoperative diagnosis of meningioma sinus invasion based on MRI radiomics and deep learning: a multicenter study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing 100190, , China.
Kuan YaoCAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing 100190, , China; School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Panpan LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Nansihuan Xilu 119, Fengtai District, Beijing, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Municipal Hospital of Weihai, China.
Zhenyu LiuCAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing 100190, , China; CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100080, China.
Tao HanDepartment of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
Zhiyong ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yuntai CaoDepartment of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
Guojin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
Junting ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Nansihuan Xilu 119, Fengtai District, Beijing, China. Electronic address: zhangjunting2003@aliyun.com.
Jie TianCAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing 100190, , China; CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100080, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China; Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710126, China; Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, 100191, China. Electronic address: jie.tian@ia.ac.cn.
Junlin ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730030, China; Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China. Electronic address: ery_zhoujl@lzu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrediction of brain invasion pre-operatively rather than postoperatively would contribute to the selection of surgical techniques, predicting meningioma grading and prognosis. Here, we aimed to predict the risk of brain invasion in meningioma pre-operatively using a nomogram by incorporating radiomic and clinical features.

methodsIn this case-control study, 1728 patients from Beijing Tiantan Hospital (training cohort: n = 1070) and Lanzhou University Second Hospital (external validation cohort: n = 658) were diagnosed with meningiomas by histopathology. Radiomic features were extracted from the T1-weighted post-contrast and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used to select the most informative features of different modalities. The support vector machine algorithm was used to predict the risk of brain invasion. Furthermore, a nomogram was constructed by incorporating radiomics signature and clinical risk factors, and decision curve analysis was used to validate the clinical usefulness of the nomogram.

findingsSixteen features were significantly correlated with brain invasion. The clinicoradiomic model derived from the fusing MRI sequences and sex resulted in the best discrimination ability for risk prediction of brain invasion, with areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0•857 (95% CI, 0•831-0•887) and 0•819 (95% CI, 0•775-0•863) and sensitivities of 72•8% and 90•1% in the training and validation cohorts, respectively.

interpretationOur clinicoradiomic model showed good performance and high sensitivity for risk prediction of brain invasion in meningioma, and can be applied in patients with meningiomas.

fundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772006, 81922040); the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (grant numbers 2019136); special fund project for doctoral training program of Lanzhou University Second Hospital (grant numbers YJS-BD-33).

Indexed as

NomogramsAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisSupport Vector MachineBrain invasionMagnetic resonance imagesMeningiomaRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID32739863
PMCPMC7393568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.