ArticleTranslational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine2021
Partnering patients, caregivers, and basic scientists: an engagement model that fosters patient- and family-centered research culture.
Article in Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunities to Enhance Cancer Research through Advocate-Researcher Partnerships.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Patient and caregiver knowledge as a driver of basic science.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Article
- Translational human gut microbiome research: What are the missing pieces of the puzzle?Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Why patient organizations are important to improve care for people with Lynch syndrome.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Chronic myeloid and lymphocytic leukemias in the elderly: public health challenges in early detection and long-term care.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- A human-centered, participatory design approach to cancer research training.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Community engagement in the context of cancer: scoping review of definitions and measures to inform program-level analysis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Article
- Lowe Syndrome and Me: a co-creation video series connecting patients, caregivers, and researchers.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- A framework for building comprehensive cancer center's capacity for bidirectional engagement.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Global hepatitis B and D community advisory board: expectations, challenges, and lessons learned.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Engaging community members in cancer research: an assessment of an NCI-designated cancer center.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- Engaging community members in cancer research: an assessment of an NCI-designated cancer center.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditionally, basic scientists have not been as engaged in the translational continuum when it comes to engagement with patients, caregivers, and other community stakeholders. In order to address this discrepancy, a multi-disciplinary team at Moffitt Cancer Center conceived of and enacted the Patient-Researcher Forum (PRF) to promote a community-engaged research approach through communication, compassion, and bi-directional research insight for both patients/caregivers and researchers. We outline the structure and implementation of the PRF, its participants, and qualitative and quantitative results across 14 sessions. PRF sessions were conducted between July 2018 and October 2019 and included 29 patients/caregivers and close to 200 researcher/staff participants; post participation survey response rates assessing the PRF experience were 27.6% (patients/caregivers) and 60.3% (researchers) on average. Research staff overwhelmingly reported that the PRF was beneficial, citing that it helped them gain new patient-centered perspectives and helped them practice communicating research to lay audiences. Patients/caregivers also reported that the PRF was valuable, indicating that they gained a better understanding of research and that they developed a personal connection with researchers. Our PRF model may provide a strategy for improving basic scientist communication, ethics, and understanding of research impacts on the populations they wish to serve. This innovative model provides a much-needed direct connection between basic scientists and patients/caregivers which creates a 2-way learning platform that fosters understanding and research ideas in the spirit of community-engaged research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.