Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32739418›Full record

ArticleTranslational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine2021

Partnering patients, caregivers, and basic scientists: an engagement model that fosters patient- and family-centered research culture.

Dana Ketcher, Anne Bidelman, Liem Q Le, Amy K Otto, Daniel K Lester, Kim K Amtmann-Beuttner, Brian D Gonzalez, Kenneth L Wright, Susan T Vadaparampil, Maija Reblin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dana KetcherMoffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, Florida.
Anne BidelmanMoffitt Cancer Center, Patient Advisory and Executive Program, Tampa, Florida.
Liem Q LeUniversity of Western States, Human Nutrition and Functional Medicine, Portland, Oregon.
Amy K OttoMoffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, Florida.
Daniel K LesterMoffitt Cancer Center, Department of Tumor Biology, Tampa, Florida.
Kim K Amtmann-BeuttnerMoffitt Cancer Center, Patient Advisory and Executive Program, Tampa, Florida.
Brian D GonzalezMoffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, Florida.
Kenneth L WrightMoffitt Cancer Center, Department of Immunology, Tampa, Florida; Moffitt Cancer Center, Office of Research Education and Training, Tampa, Florida.
Susan T VadaparampilMoffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, Florida; Moffitt Cancer Center, Office of Community Outreach, Engagement and Equity, Tampa, Florida.
Maija ReblinMoffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, Florida.
Eric K LauMoffitt Cancer Center, Department of Tumor Biology, Tampa, Florida. Electronic address: Eric.Lau@Moffitt.org.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI John L. Cleveland · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentT32CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Vani N Simmons, SUSAN T VADAPARAMPIL · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, basic scientists have not been as engaged in the translational continuum when it comes to engagement with patients, caregivers, and other community stakeholders. In order to address this discrepancy, a multi-disciplinary team at Moffitt Cancer Center conceived of and enacted the Patient-Researcher Forum (PRF) to promote a community-engaged research approach through communication, compassion, and bi-directional research insight for both patients/caregivers and researchers. We outline the structure and implementation of the PRF, its participants, and qualitative and quantitative results across 14 sessions. PRF sessions were conducted between July 2018 and October 2019 and included 29 patients/caregivers and close to 200 researcher/staff participants; post participation survey response rates assessing the PRF experience were 27.6% (patients/caregivers) and 60.3% (researchers) on average. Research staff overwhelmingly reported that the PRF was beneficial, citing that it helped them gain new patient-centered perspectives and helped them practice communicating research to lay audiences. Patients/caregivers also reported that the PRF was valuable, indicating that they gained a better understanding of research and that they developed a personal connection with researchers. Our PRF model may provide a strategy for improving basic scientist communication, ethics, and understanding of research impacts on the populations they wish to serve. This innovative model provides a much-needed direct connection between basic scientists and patients/caregivers which creates a 2-way learning platform that fosters understanding and research ideas in the spirit of community-engaged research.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyModels, OrganizationalPatient-Centered CareCancer Care FacilitiesHumansResearch

Identifiers

PMID32739418
PMCPMC7719089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.