Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32739345›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2020

Retrieval practice facilitation of family psychoeducation in people with early psychosis.

J Daniel Ragland, Xiaonan L Liu, Ashley B Williams, Laura M Tully, Tara A Niendam, Cameron S Carter, Charan Ranganath

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Daniel RaglandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California at Davis, Imaging Research Center, 4700 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. Electronic address: jdragland@ucdavis.edu.
Xiaonan L LiuDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California at Davis, Imaging Research Center, 4700 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California at Davis, Center for Neuroscience, 1544, Newton Ct, Davis, CA 95618, USA.
Ashley B WilliamsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California at Davis, Imaging Research Center, 4700 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California at Davis, Center for Neuroscience, 1544, Newton Ct, Davis, CA 95618, USA.
Laura M TullyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California at Davis, Imaging Research Center, 4700 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Tara A NiendamDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California at Davis, Imaging Research Center, 4700 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Cameron S CarterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California at Davis, Imaging Research Center, 4700 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Charan RanganathDepartment of Psychology, University of California at Davis, Center for Neuroscience, 1544, Newton Ct, Davis, CA 95618, USA.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Learning, Memory, and Plasticity (LaMP) Training ProgramT32MH112507 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Karen Zito · 2017 to 2026
$2.4M
Neural Mechanisms of Memory Dysfunction in SchizophreniaR01MH105411 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI RAGLAND, JOHN D, RANGANATH, CHARAN · 2015 to 2018
$1.9M
Brain mechanisms of impaired episodic memory in schizophreniaR01MH084895 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI RAGLAND, JOHN D · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084895NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105411NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH112507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding early psychosis (EP) individuals with family psychoeducation (FPE) can reduce symptoms and improve clinical outcomes. However, relational memory problems may limit prospective utilization of FPE information. This study examines whether memory for FPE can be improved by testing participants during the initial FPE workshop presentation.

methodData were obtained from 20 people with EP and 20 demographically matched healthy comparison subjects (HC). During session one, FPE was presented in small group workshops, with half of the information re-studied twice (re-study condition) and the remaining information tested twice using cued recall tasks (retrieval practice condition). One week later (session two), delayed cued recall was tested for all FPE information. "Testing effects" (i.e., better memory following retrieval practice versus re-study) were examined across all items (standard analysis) and also limited to items successfully retrieved during session one (conditionalized analysis).

resultsHC had better initial recall and learned more over the two retrieval practice trials than EP. However, HC also lost more information than EP over the one-week delay. Both groups produced a significant testing effect. This effect was smaller in EP versus HC across all test items, but did not differ for the conditionalized analysis. Negative symptoms were inversely correlated with delayed cued recall in EP.

conclusionsEP participants benefit from retrieval practice, with participants with less severe negative symptoms showing the greatest benefit. These results encourage use of memory tests during group psychoeducation to improve subsequent long-term recall of clinically relevant information.

Indexed as

Mental RecallPsychotic DisordersCuesHumansMemoryProspective StudiesEpisodic memoryPsychoeducationPsychosisRetrieval practiceTesting effect

Identifiers

PMID32739345
PMCPMC7704829
OpenAlexW3046132927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.