Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32738883›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2020

Research on the quality hospice care of elderly cancer patients in China under social work intervention.

Li Wang, Zhizhong Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hospice Care Preferences and Its Associated Factors among Community-Dwelling Residents in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li WangDeparment of Social Work, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China. xueshuyanjiu99@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1540-7826
Zhizhong WangDeparment of Social Work, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China.
Shanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

Chongqing social science planning project 2017YBGL133Education Scientific Planning Foundation project of Shanxi of China GH-17022Ministry of education of Humanities and Social Science project 18YJC630189Program for the Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi 201803066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have specifically addressed quality of life issues for elderly hospice patients. The purpose of this study is to explore various factors and service patterns of the quality of life of end-of-life care for the elderly.

methodsWe collect the data and make small-scale exploratory study via semi-structured individual interviews. Data were collected from the family of 2 elderly cancer patients receiving hospice services, and the data were analyzed qualitatively.

resultsAfter investigation, we found that elderly people in hospice care, regardless of age, are suffering from physical and psychological pain and do not want to spend the rest of their lives in the hospital, but want to die in their own homes.

conclusionsBoth hospitalization and in-home care can improve resource utilization, and the key is to find various factors affecting the quality of life. Improving the quality of life is what patients and their families need most.

Indexed as

Social WorkAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHealth PersonnelHospice CareHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatientsQuality of Health CareElderly cancer patientsQuality hospice careSocial work intervention

Identifiers

PMID32738883
PMCPMC7395976
OpenAlexW3046782038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.