ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020
Mapping the situation of research on coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): a preliminary bibliometric analysis during the early stage of the outbreak.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- [Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on COVID-19 elaborated by staff of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2022Pooled it
- A bibliometric analysis of linguistic research on COVID-19.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Literature on the Early Phase of COVID-19 in Italy.Frontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluating a Nationwide Neonatal Research Infrastructure: A Bibliometric Network Analysis of the Korean Neonatal Network.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Survival analysis and mortality predictors of COVID-19 across the six-wave pattern of the pandemic in Monastir, Tunisia : COVID-19 mortality predictors in Monastir across six waves.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Collaboration, impact, and research trends at the veterinary research institutes of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences: a bibliometric analysis from 2009 to 2023.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- The 100 most-cited articles in COVID-19: a bibliometric analysis.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- Global landscape of COVID-19 research: a visualization analysis of randomized clinical trials.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Global Mapping and Visualization Analysis of One Health Knowledge in the COVID-19 Context.Environmental health insights · 2024Article
- A Survey on COVID-19 Data Analysis Using AI, IoT, and Social Media.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Morocco: short communication.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- The state of current research on COVID-19 and antibiotic use: global implications for antimicrobial resistance.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2023Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Nature-Based Therapy Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Did Ghana Do Enough? A Scientometric Analysis of COVID-19 Research Output from Ghana within the African Context.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- An investigation of emerging COVID-19 research trends and future implications for LIS field: A bibliometric mapping and visualization.Journal of librarianship and information science · 2023Article
- Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction in COVID-19: A Global Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2023Article
- COVID research across the social sciences in 2020: a bibliometric approach.Scientometrics · 2023Article
- COVID-19 and the scientific publishing system: growth, open access and scientific fields.Scientometrics · 2023Article
- Oman's COVID-19 publication trends: A cross-sectional bibliometric study.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Current global research landscape on COVID-19 and cancer: Bibliometric and visualization analysis.World journal of clinical oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe novel coronavirus, named as 2019-nCoV or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has recently appeared in China and has spread worldwide, presenting a health threat to the global community. Therefore, it is important to understand the global scientific output of COVID-19 research during the early stage of the outbreak. Thus, to track the current hotspots, and highlight future directions, we performed a bibliometric analysis to obtain an approximate scenario of COVID-19 to date.
methodsRelevant studies to COVID-19 were obtained from the Scopus database during the early stage of the outbreak. We then analysed the data by using well-established bibliometric indices: document type, country, collaboration patterns, affiliation, journal name, and citation patterns. VOSviewer was applied to map and determine hot topics in this field.
resultsThe bibliometric analysis indicated that there were 19,044 publications on Scopus published on COVID-19 during the early stage of the outbreak (December 2019 up until June 19, 2020). Of all these publications, 9140 (48.0%) were articles; 4192 (22.0%) were letters; 1797 (9.4%) were reviews; 1754 (9.2%) were editorials; 1728 (9.1%) were notes; and 433 (2.3%) were others. The USA published the largest number of publications on COVID-19 (4479; 23.4%), followed by China (3310; 17.4%), Italy, (2314; 12.2%), and the UK (1981; 10.4%). British Medical Journal was the most productive. The Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Tongji Medical, and Harvard Medical School were the institutions that published the largest number of COVID-19 research. The most prevalent topics of research in COVID-19 include "clinical features studies", "pathological findings and therapeutic design", "care facilities preparation and infection control", and "maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes".
conclusionsThis bibliometric study may reflect rapidly emerging topics on COVID-19 research, where substantial research activity has already begun extensively during the early stage of the outbreak. The findings reported here shed new light on the major progress in the near future for hot topics on COVID-19 research including clinical features studies, pathological findings and therapeutic design, care facilities preparation and infection control, and maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.