Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32738875›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2020

Topical citicoline and vitamin B12 versus placebo in the treatment of diabetes-related corneal nerve damage: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

Paolo Fogagnolo, Ettore Melardi, Laura Tranchina, Luca Rossetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03906513 (Evaluation of the Efficacy of OMK2 in Recovering Corneal Neural Damage in Patients With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03906513 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the Efficacy of OMK2 in Recovering Corneal Neural Damage in Patients With Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MilanRan2017 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsCorneaArmsOMK2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. [The role of citicoline in glaucoma].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Paolo FogagnoloEye Clinic, Università degli Studi di Milano; ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Via di Rudini', 8, 20142, Milan, Italy. fogagnolopaolo@googlemail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-5365
Ettore MelardiEye Clinic, Università degli Studi di Milano; ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Via di Rudini', 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Laura TranchinaEye Clinic, Università degli Studi di Milano; ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Via di Rudini', 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Luca RossettiEye Clinic, Università degli Studi di Milano; ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Via di Rudini', 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
AOL (United States) · US

Funding

Omikron Italia s.r.l. not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the effects of topical citicoline and vitamin B12 (Cit-B12: OMK2, Omikron Italia srl, Italy) on corneal innervation of patients with diabetic neuropathy.

methodsThis prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study included 30 patients randomised with a 2:1 ratio to Cit-B12 or placebo 3 times daily for 18 months. At baseline and at months 4, 8, 12, 18 patients underwent the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire (OSDI), tear break-up time, evaluation of corneal and conjunctival staining, Schirmer I test, Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry, and confocal biomicroscopy of corneal sub-basal plexus (SBP). Fiber lenght density (FLD) was calculated using NeuronJ and expressed in mm/mm2. Raw data and differences from baseline were analysed in the two groups.

results29/30 patients concluded the study. The two groups had similar FLD at baseline; it progressively improved up to month 18 in both groups (Cit-B12, p < 0.0001; controls, < 0.0001-0.03); improvement at month 18 vs baseline was higher in Cit-B12 than placebo (33% vs 15%, p = 0.04). A progressive amelioration of corneal sensitivity (baseline, 28 ± 18 mm; month 18, 52 ± 10 mm, p < 0.0001), conjunctival staining (P = 0.04) and OSDI questionnaire (P = 0.05) were shown on Cit-B12 group alone. Both treatments were well tolerated and adherence during the study was high.

conclusionsCit-B12 ameliorated both morphology and function of corneal nerves in patients with diabetes, thus suggesting a neuroregenerative effect.

trial registrationTrial registration NCT03906513 , retrospectively registered on 08 April 2019.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic NeuropathiesDry Eye SyndromesCorneaCytidine Diphosphate CholineHumansProspective StudiesTearsVitamin B 12Cytidine Diphosphate CholineVitamin B 12CiticolineCornea innervationCorneal sensitivityDiabetesDry eye diseaseVitamin B12

Identifiers

PMID32738875
PMCPMC7395393
OpenAlexW3046654114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.