Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32738724›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research. Neuroimaging2020

Cortical plasticity in phantom limb pain: A fMRI study on the neural correlates of behavioral clinical manifestations.

D Duarte, C C C Bauer, C B Pinto, F G Saleh Velez, M A Estudillo-Guerra, K Pacheco-Barrios, M E Gunduz, D Crandell, L Merabet, F Fregni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolving techniques for reducing phantom limb pain.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

D DuarteSpaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School. 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University. 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON L8N 3K7, Canada.
C C C BauerMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT. 43 Vassar St, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus UNAM 3001, 76230 Juriquilla, Querétaro, 76230, México; Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, 805 Columbus Avenue, Boston, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: cccbauer@mit.edu.
C B PintoSpaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School. 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
F G Saleh VelezSpaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School. 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA; University of Chicago Medical Center, Department of Neurology, University of Chicago. 5841 S Maryland Ave # C411, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
M A Estudillo-GuerraSpaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School. 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
K Pacheco-BarriosSpaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School. 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA; Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud. Lima, Peru. Av. La Fontana 750 Edificio El Cubo, La Molina - Perú.
M E GunduzSpaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School. 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
D CrandellSpaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School. 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
L MerabetMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School. 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
F FregniSpaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School. 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School. 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: Fregni.Felipe@mgh.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

Pragmatic Trial of Remote tDCS and Somatosensory Training for Phantom Limb Pain with Machine Learning to Predict Treatment ResponseR01HD082302 · NICHD · SPAULDING REHABILITATION HOSPITAL · PI Felipe Fregni · 2015 to 2026
$4.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural mechanism of phantom limb pain (PLP) is related to the intense brain reorganization process implicating plasticity after deafferentation mostly in sensorimotor system. There is a limited understanding of the association between the sensorimotor system and PLP. We used a novel task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach to (1) assess neural activation within a-priori selected regions-of-interested (motor cortex [M1], somatosensory cortex [S1], and visual cortex [V1]), (2) quantify the cortical representation shift in the affected M1, and (3) correlate these changes with baseline clinical characteristics. In a sample of 18 participants, we found a significantly increased activity in M1 and S1 as well as a shift in motor cortex representation that was not related to PLP intensity. In an exploratory analyses (not corrected for multiple comparisons), they were directly correlated with time since amputation; and there was an association between increased activity in M1 with a lack of itching sensation and V1 activation was negatively correlated with PLP. Longer periods of amputation lead to compensatory changes in sensory-motor areas; and itching seems to be a protective marker for less signal changes. We confirmed that PLP intensity is not associated with signal changes in M1 and S1 but in V1.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityPhantom LimbSensorimotor CortexSomatosensory CortexYoung AdultBrain activationMotor cortexMotor cortex representationPhantom limb painSomato-sensory cortexTask-based fMRIVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID32738724
PMCPMC9394643
OpenAlexW3044781421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.