ArticleChest2020
Variation Between Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards in Clinical Staging and Treatment Recommendations for Patients With Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Chest, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multidisciplinary meeting review in nonsmall cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic factors and survival prediction for patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: A population-based study.Medicine · 2022Trial
- Observational
- Review
- Resectability and Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A European Case-Vignette Survey.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Current advances in extended resections for non-small cell lung cancer-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Multidisciplinary team meetings for lung cancer in the Nordic countries: results from a Nordic survey.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Combining computed tomography radiomics and clinical features to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with lung cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Efficiency and safety of sintilimab-based induction therapy in potentially resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (LungMate-009): an open-label, phase 2 trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Discrepancies in regional lung cancer multidisciplinary team decisions can be reduced through national consensus meetings.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- The sarcoma ring trial: a case-based analysis of inter-center agreement across 21 German-speaking sarcoma centers.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of multidisciplinary team discrepancies on comparative lung cancer outcome analyses and treatment equality.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Using artificial intelligence based imaging to predict lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Contemporary Strategies: Incorporating Immunotherapy into Stage 3 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024Article
- Challenges and controversies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a clinician's perspective.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Review
- The investigation of construction and clinical application of image recognition technology assisted bronchoscopy diagnostic model of lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Virtual Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: A Narrative Review Focused on Lung Cancer.Pulmonary therapy · 2021Review
- Continuity and coordination of care in highly selected chronic cancer patients treated with multiple repeat radiation therapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
- The Impact of the Availability of Immunotherapy on Patterns of Care in Stage III NSCLC: A Dutch Multicenter Analysis.JTO clinical and research reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate diagnosis and staging are crucial to ensure uniform allocation to the optimal treatment methods for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but may differ among multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs). Discordance between clinical and pathologic TNM stage is particularly important for patients with locally advanced NSCLC (stage IIIA) because it may influence their chance of allocation to curative-intent treatment. We therefore aimed to study agreement on staging and treatment to gain insight into MDT decision-making. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the level of agreement on clinical staging and treatment recommendations among MDTs in stage IIIA NSCLC patients? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsEleven MDTs each evaluated the same 10 pathologic stage IIIA NSCLC patients in their weekly meeting (n = 110). Patients were selected purposively for their challenging nature. All MDTs received exactly the same clinical information and images per patient. We tested agreement in cT stage, cN stage, cM stage (TNM 8th edition), and treatment proposal among MDTs using Randolph's free-marginal multirater kappa.
resultsConsiderable variation among the MDTs was seen in T staging (κ, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.34-0.75]), N staging (κ, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35-0.83]), overall TNM staging (κ, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.35-0.72]), and treatment recommendations (κ, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.32-0.56]). Most variation in T stage was seen in patients with suspicion of invasion of surrounding structures, which influenced such treatment recommendations as induction therapy and type. For N stage, distinction between N1 and N2 disease was an important source of discordance among MDTs. Variation occurred between 2 patients even regarding M stage. A wide range of additional diagnostics was proposed by the MDTs.
interpretationThis study demonstrated high variation in staging and treatment of patients with stage IIIA NSCLC among MDTs in different hospitals. Although some variation may be unavoidable in these challenging patients, we should strive for more uniformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.