ReviewCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2021
The evolving role of interventional cardiology in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension.
Review in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventional strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension: Current perspectives and future directions.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Complete Revascularization of the Pulmonary Circulation in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Value of Addressing Chronic Total Occlusions.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Cancer Therapy-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension and Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Etiologies and Prognostic Implications.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Hydroxy-Safflower Yellow A Mitigates Vascular Remodeling in Rat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Article
- Effect of Combination of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Medical Therapy on Reverse Right Ventricular Remodeling and Hemodynamics in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.The Journal of invasive cardiology · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a heterogeneous group of diseases defined by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure greater than 20 mmHg. Clinically, PH is classified into five groups and the group of PH generally defines the cause of PH and the therapeutic options. Currently, medical therapies that target the prostacyclin, endothelin, and nitric oxide pathways are used in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) patients. Moreover, surgery can improve outcomes in PH as pulmonary thromboendarterectomy can be curative for CTEPH and lung transplantation is used for end-stage PH. Despite these diverse treatment options, PH patients continue to have high symptom burden and poor long-term outcomes. However, advances in percutaneous technology are opening new avenues for the management of PH. In this review, we discuss the available data supporting the use of four interventional procedures: balloon atrial septostomy, transcatheter Potts shunt, balloon pulmonary angioplasty, and pulmonary artery denervation for the treatment of PH. These procedures provide hemodynamic and functional improvements in PH patients, but they come with their own unique risk profiles. Hopefully, these procedures will continue to be refined and thereby provide a venue for interventional cardiology to safely and effectively improve outcomes for PH moving forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.