ArticleExperimental dermatology2020
Development and characterization of a human Th17-driven ex vivo skin inflammation model.
Article in Experimental dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibiting HuR-Mediated mRNA Stabilization Attenuates Psoriasis-Like Inflammation in Preclinical Models.Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Skin-on-chip: Quo vadis?APL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Assessment of Minipigs as a Non-clinical Model for Screening and Derisking Injection Site Reactions in Clinical Trials.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- A human ex vivo skin model breaking boundaries.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Principles for optimization and validation of mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccines against COVID-19 using 3D bioprinting.Nano today · 2022Article
- Development and characterization of a human Th17-driven ex vivo skin inflammation model.Experimental dermatology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin models mimicking features of psoriasis-related inflammation are needed to support the development of new drugs in dermatology. Reconstructed skin models lack tissue complexity, including a fully competent skin barrier, and presence and/or diversity of immune cells. Here, we describe InflammaSkin®, a novel human Th17-driven ex vivo skin inflammation model. In this model, skin-resident T cells are in situ activated by intradermal injection of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies and Th17 cell polarization is sustained by culture in a chemically defined medium supplemented with IL-1β, IL-23 and TGF-β for seven days. The acquired Th17 signature is demonstrated by the sustained secretion of IL-17A, IL-17AF, IL-17F, IL-22, IFN-γ, and to some degree IL-15 and TNF-α observed in the activated ex vivo skin inflammation model compared with the non-activated skin model control. Furthermore, expression of S100A7 and Keratin-16 by keratinocytes and loss of epidermal structure integrity occur subsequently to in situ Th17cell activation, demonstrating cellular crosstalk between Th17 cells and keratinocytes. Finally, we demonstrate the use of this model to investigate the modulation of the IL-23/IL-17 immune axis by topically applied anti-inflammatory compounds. Taken together, we show that by in situ activation of skin-resident Th17 cells, the InflammaSkin® model reproduces aspects of inflammatory responses observed in psoriatic lesions and could be used as a translational tool to assess efficacy of test compounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.