Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737760›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2020

A Comparison of Analgesia After a Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Operation with a Sustained Epidural Block and a Sustained Paravertebral Block: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Qiao-Wen Huang, Jia-Bin Li, Ye Huang, Wen-Qing Zhang, Zhi-Wei Lu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05595096 (Comparison of Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Combined Laryngeal Mask Airway With Preservation of Spontaneous Breathing Versus General Anesthesia Using Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05595096 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Combined Laryngeal Mask Airway With Preservation of Spontaneous Breathing Versus General Anesthesia Using Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery:

TypeinterventionalSponsorZhenjiang First People's HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled59ConditionsThoracoscopic SurgeryArmsGeneral anesthesia with preservation of spontaneous breathing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiao-Wen HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, 363000, China.
Jia-Bin LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, 363000, China.
Ye HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, 363000, China.
Wen-Qing ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, 363000, China.
Zhi-Wei LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, 363000, China. luzhiwei9366@163.com.
Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital of Fujian Province · CNFujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to compare the challenge of puncture and catheterization and the effect of postoperative analgesia of ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block and the continuous epidural analgesia in patients receiving thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

methodsOne-hundred and fifty patients received elective unilateral thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer and were randomized into three groups; test group 1 (T group), test group 2 (P group), and the control group (E group). Both of the test groups received ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) while the control group received continuous epidural analgesia. After the operation, all the patients in the test groups received the same postoperative analgesia; loading dose 0.5 mg kg

resultsThe success rates of the puncture and catheterization in group T were the highest. Compared with group P, the failure rate of the puncture in group E was lower (p < 0.05), but the success rate of catheterization was higher (p < 0.05). The puncture time in group T was the shortest; there was no difference between group E and group T. The time of catheterization in group P was the longest, this was followed by group T, and was the fastest in group E. The stable time of the block level in group E was shorter than that in groups P and T, but was similar between groups P and T. The block level of all three groups in the 4 h postoperative period was similar (p > 0.05), while the 4 h postoperative levels of groups P and T were reduced significantly (p < 0.05).

conclusionThe continuous analgesia technique of paravertebral space catheterization cannot replace the continuous epidural analgesia in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery as the latter technique is still considered to be the gold standard.

trial registrationChina Clinical Trial Registration Center identifier ChiCTR1900020973.

Indexed as

AgedAnalgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesicsChinaFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNerve BlockPain ManagementPostoperative PainPostoperative PeriodThoracoscopyAnalgesicsAnalgesiaSustained epidural blockSustained paravertebral blockThoracoscopic lung cancer operationThoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID32737760
OpenAlexW3046468729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.