ArticleJournal of community health2020
A Systematic Evaluation of Barriers and Facilitators to the Provision of Services for Justice-Involved Women.
Article in Journal of community health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inequities in Mental Health Services: A 16-Year Longitudinal Study of Youth in the Justice System.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2024Article
- Justice for rural women: An exploratory analysis of institutions and mechanisms to access justice in Chimborazo, Ecuador.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Women and Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: Contributors to Treatment Success From the Perspectives of Women in Recovery, Women With Past Attempts in Drug Treatment, and Health and Criminal Justice Professionals.Substance use : research and treatmentArticle
- Criminal Justice-Involved Veterans Not Engaged in Primary Care in the Veterans Health Administration.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The community health delivery system (CHDS) are vital agencies to the success of integration and the provision of services to improve the health and well-being of justice-involved women. Many agencies face barriers and challenges in providing services to vulnerable populations, such as justice-involved women, and, as a result, often offer individual rather than coordinator care. Thus, it is necessary to explore CHDS systemic barriers and challenges to identify opportunities for coordinated care. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 26 CHDS directors or designees to identify systemic barriers and challenges, organizational processes, experiences with vulnerable populations, services and programs, and care coordination and perceived women's barriers and challenges to the provision of services including decision-making processes and access. Qualitative analyses were used to construct thematic descriptions in five areas: (1) mental health as an unmet need, (2) financial constraints, (3) limited organizational capacity, (4) implicit bias, and (5) minimal cultural support of vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32737745What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.