ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2020
Complete response to therapy: why do primary central nervous system lymphoma patients not return to work?
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of the Fatigue Syndrome in Patients with Primary CNS Lymphoma - A Protocol for a Randomized and Controlled Single Center Clinical Trial.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Work Disability and Return to Work After Lymphoma: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Long-term psychological and neurological outcomes among people with a history of non-malignant meningioma in the UK Biobank cohort.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) represent extremely aggressive brain tumours, high-dose methotrexate in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents has resulted in long-term disease control in a substantial fraction of patients. Advances in treatment efficacy with longer survival resulted in a focus on additional outcome measures such as quality of life (QoL) and neurocognition. Despite recent evidence of return to work as an important aspect of patients' QoL, little is known about occupational reintegration in PCNSL long-term survivors. This study aimed to detect specific characteristics of patients who successfully resumed work after complete response to therapy.
methodsPatients with ongoing complete response to therapy completed a test battery capturing neurocognition, social integration, QoL and psychological burden. Of 25 patients who had been in regular employment before diagnosis only eight returned to work after treatment (32%).
resultsPatients who resumed work rated important aspects of their QoL and social integration as higher and suffered less from symptoms affecting QoL than patients who did not resume work. Also, the subjective confidence in their ability to work was higher in patients who resumed work, but independent predictors of return to work were not found in logistic regression analyses.
conclusionOccupational (re)integration is of clinical relevance in PCNSL patients after complete response to therapy. Due to the small size of our cohort the present results should be considered an exploratory first step. Return to work might be a crucial aspect of QoL and (re)integration into society after cure of PCNSL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.