ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020
Long-term outcomes of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for microbial keratitis in a tertiary care center in Turkey.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Challenges and Long-Term Outcomes in Corneal Transplantation in Infectious Keratitis-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in corneal transplantation.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Tectonic and Therapeutic Urgent Penetrating Keratoplasty Outcomes.Beyoglu eye journal · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo present the long-term results of therapeutic keratoplasty for microbial keratitis in moderate to advanced phases.
methodsThe medical records of 44 patients who underwent therapeutic keratoplasty for microbial keratitis at the ophthalmology clinic of a training and research hospital between June 2012 and March 2018 were reviewed in this retrospective study.
resultsOf the 65 patients that underwent TPKP, 44 eyes of 44 patients met the inclusion criteria and enrolled in this study. The most commonly found predisposing factor for keratitis was a history of trauma (n = 17, 38.6%), and most of them had occurred with a vegetative matter (n = 14, 31.8%). The most common clinically suspected cause was fungal (n = 17, 38.6%) followed by bacterial (n = 12, 27.3%). In 26 (59.1%) cases, the causative microorganism could not be proved with a microbial culture. The most common causative microorganism was Staphylococcus spp. (n = 4, 9.1%), followed by Fusarium solanii (n = 3, 6.8%). The mean follow-up time was 42 (range 12-54) months. At the last follow-up visit, anatomical success was achieved in 40 (90.9%) cases and the BCVA of more than half of the patients was over 1.0 (logMAR, n = 24, 54.5%). Most commonly seen complication was found to be secondary glaucoma (n = 19, 43.2%), followed by cataracts (n = 9, 34.6%) and graft rejection (n = 12, 27.3%).
conclusionsTPKP offers a definitive solution in the management of microbial keratitis with high rates of anatomical and functional success. However, secondary glaucoma is the most common complication after TPKP, which was seen in almost half of the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.