Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737716›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2020

Measuring Fidelity to Evidence-Based Practices: Psychometrics.

T Ruud, R E Drake, G R Bond

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03271242 (A Pairwise Randomized Study on Implementation of Guidelines and Evidence Based Treatments of Psychoses), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03271242 completednot on this map

A Pairwise Randomized Study on Implementation of Guidelines and Evidence Based Treatments of Psychoses

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2016 to 2018Enrolled325ConditionsPsychotic DisordersArmsSystematic implementation support, No implementation support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

T RuudMental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway. torleif.ruud@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0002-4821-1267
R E DrakeWestat, Lebanon, NH, USA.
G R BondWestat, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Westat (United States) · USUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This special section presents the psychometric properties of fidelity scales used in a national mental health services project in Norway to improve the quality of care of people with psychoses. Across Norway, 39 clinical units in six health trusts participated. The project provided education, implementation support and fidelity assessments. The papers in the section address the psychometrics of fidelity measurement for the specific evidence-based practices: illness management and recovery, family psychoeducation, physical healthcare and antipsychotic medication management. Another paper analyzes the psychometrics of a scale measuring individualization and quality improvement that may be used in conjunction with fidelity scales for specific evidence-based practices. The first paper in the section presents the development and field of fidelity scales, and the two final papers with comments add some additional perspectives and discuss fidelity scales in a wider context. The psychometrics of the five scales were good to excellent. Fidelity assessment is a necessary and effective strategy for quality improvement.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsMental Health ServicesPsychotic DisordersEvidence-Based PracticeHumansPsychometricsAntipsychotic AgentsEvidence-based practicesFidelity scalesPsychometricsPsychosis

Identifiers

PMID32737716
PMCPMC7547989
OpenAlexW3046699007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.