ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020
Laparoscopic HIPEC for Low-Volume Peritoneal Metastasis in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05546619 (Research on Effectiveness and Safety of the Treatment, Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined With Tislelizumab and Targeted Therapy, That is Used for High-risk Hepatocellular Carcinoma After R0 Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Research on Effectiveness and Safety of the Treatment, Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined With Tislelizumab and Targeted Therapy, That is Used for High-risk Hepatocellular Carcinoma After R0 Resection
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytoreduction and HIPEC for Gastric Carcinomatosis: Multi-institutional Analysis of Two Phase II Clinical Trials.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Trial
- The CONVERGENCE trial protocol: a phase II/III trial for conversion surgery for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Educational Review: Updates on Therapeutic Strategies for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Initial Experience Using Laparoscopic HIPEC for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis: Safety and Outcomes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- Study on the thermal stability of nab-paclitaxel during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2023Article
- Gastric adenocarcinoma peritoneal carcinomatosis: a narrative review.Digestive medicine research · 2022Article
- Current Trends in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Disease from Appendiceal and Colorectal Malignancies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Article
- Laparoscopic Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Carcinomatosis of Gastric Adenocarcinoma Origin.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe seek to determine whether laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (LS-HIPEC) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and low-volume peritoneal metastasis compared with standard of care treatment. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe reviewed data from a prospectively maintained database of patients with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to identify patients with radiologically occult carcinomatosis or positive peritoneal cytology, no evidence of distant metastasis, and without disease progression during initial chemotherapy or observation. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of LS-HIPEC on OS.
resultsWe identified 25 patients who underwent LS-HIPEC and 27 treated with a standard of care approach due to patient (33.3%) or provider (51.9%) preference or financial limitations/lack of insurance coverage (14.8%). Resection was ultimately performed in 28% of LS-HIPEC patients and no standard care patients. At a median follow-up of 18.9 months, median OS was 24.7 (IQR 20.8-34.2) months in LS-HIPEC patients and 21.3 (IQR 12.3-23.1) months in standard care patients (p = 0.08). Three-year OS in the LS-HIPEC group was 19.1%, compared with 9.6% (p = 0.08). Patients who underwent resection had a median OS of 25.3 (IQR 22.6-47.1) months compared with 21.3 months in standard care patients (p = 0.05).
conclusionsNeoadjuvant LS-HIPEC for the treatment of low-volume peritoneal disease in gastric and gastroesophageal cancer patients did not significantly improve OS compared with standard care. Multiinstitutional studies are necessary to further elucidate the benefit of LS-HIPEC for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.