Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737683›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2020

Can we trust biomarkers identified using different non-targeted metabolomics platforms? Multi-platform, inter-laboratory comparative metabolomics profiling of lettuce cultivars via UPLC-QTOF-MS.

Carlos J García, Xiao Yang, Danfeng Huang, Francisco A Tomás-Barberán

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multiplatform untargeted metabolomics.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Advances in Microbial NMR Metabolomics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos J GarcíaResearch Group on Quality, Safety, and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Center for Applied Soil Science and Biology of the Segura, Spanish National Research Council (CEBAS-CSIC), 30100, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5813-092X
Xiao YangInstitute of Urban Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu National Agricultural Science and Technology Center, Chengdu, 610213, People's Republic of China.
Danfeng HuangSchool of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People's Republic of China. hdf@sjtu.edu.cn.
Francisco A Tomás-BarberánResearch Group on Quality, Safety, and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Center for Applied Soil Science and Biology of the Segura, Spanish National Research Council (CEBAS-CSIC), 30100, Murcia, Spain. fatomas@cebas.csic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionData analysis during UPLC-MS non-targeted metabolomics introduces variation as different manufacturers use specific algorithms for data treatment and this makes untargeted metabolomics an application for the discovery of new biomarkers with low confidence in the reproducibility of the results under the use of different metabolomics platforms.

objectivesThis study compared the ability of two platforms (Agilent UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS and Waters UPLC-IMS-QTOF-MS) to identify biomarkers in butterhead and romaine lettuce cultivars.

methodsTwo case studies by different metabolomics platforms: (1) Waters and Agilent datasets processed by the same data pre-processing software (Progenesis QI), and (2) Datasets processed by different data pre-processing software.

resultsA higher number of candidate biomarkers shared between sample groups in case 2 (101) than in case 1 (26) was found. Thirteen metabolites were common to both cases. Romaine lettuce was characterised by phenolic compounds including flavonoids, hydroxycinnamate derivatives, and 9-undecenal, while Butterhead showed sesquiterpene lactones and xanthosine. This study demonstrates that high percentages of the most discriminatory entities can be obtained by using the manufacturers' embedded pre-processing software and following the recommended processing data guidelines using commercial software to normalise the data matrix.

Indexed as

BiomarkersChromatography, High Pressure LiquidLaboratoriesLactucaMetabolomeMetabolomicsPhenolsPlant LeavesReproducibility of ResultsTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkersPhenolsLettuce biomarkersMetabolic profilingMulti-platform analysisMultivariate analysisPlant metabolomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.