Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737680›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2020

Roadmap for Effective School-Based Practices to Support Expectant and Parenting Youth: Lessons from the New Heights Program in Washington, DC.

Subuhi Asheer, Susan Zief, Ruth Neild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Subuhi AsheerMathematica, P.O. Box 2393, Princeton, NJ, 08543, USA. sasheer@mathematica-mpr.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0155-2117
Susan ZiefMathematica, P.O. Box 2393, Princeton, NJ, 08543, USA.
Ruth NeildMathematica, P.O. Box 2393, Princeton, NJ, 08543, USA.

Funding

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services HHSP233201450026A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNew Heights is a voluntary school-based program that provides a well-defined system of supports for expectant and parenting students in Washington, DC, and was found to be effective at improving educational outcomes. This study explores the program elements and practices that, when used together, improved academic outcomes for New Heights participants and define a possible roadmap for service providers interested in replicating the program's success.

methodsThe study team collected data through site visits, key informant interviews, staff surveys, program observations, case files, and program materials.

resultsThe core design and implementation elements of the New Heights program are (1) placing a trained staff member in the school to provide advocacy, case management, education, and in-kind incentives; (2) bringing community-based service providers into the school; (3) giving trained staff autonomy and a strong grounding in local context; and (4) using a highly collaborative process to hire and support school-based coordinators. DISCUSSION: Staff and funders interested in improving outcomes for young parents in school could use the experience of New Heights and the key practices that were critical to its success as a guide: (1) ensure that the program is well defined but can be tailored to the needs of schools and students, (2) engage community partners to bring services to participants, (3) hire and train the right staff who are committed to "do whatever it takes," (4) actively cultivate a culture of collaboration among program staff, and (5) develop buy-in with school staff and illustrate program value.

Indexed as

ParentingPregnancy in AdolescenceProgram DevelopmentAdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesDistrict of ColumbiaFemaleHumansPregnancySchoolsSocial SupportStudent DropoutsAdvocacyCase managementExpectant and parenting youthProgram implementationSchool-based programs

Identifiers

PMID32737680
PMCPMC7497361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.