Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737599›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2020

Antimicrobial peptide polymers: no escape to ESKAPE pathogens-a review.

Songhita Mukhopadhyay, A S Bharath Prasad, Chetan H Mehta, Usha Y Nayak

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Strategic Approaches to Improvise Peptide Drugs as Next Generation Therapeutics.International journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  16. Discovery and analysis of a novel antimicrobial peptide B1AW from the skin secretion ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Songhita MukhopadhyayDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
A S Bharath PrasadDepartment of Ageing Research, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Chetan H MehtaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Usha Y NayakDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India. usha.nayak@manipal.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1995-3114
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research 2020-4549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the significant clinical challenges and also an emerging area of concern arising from nosocomial infections of ESKAPE pathogens, which has been on the rise in both the developed and developing countries alike. These pathogens/superbugs can undergo rapid mutagenesis, which helps them to generate resistance against antimicrobials in addition to the patient's non-adherence to the antibiotic regimen. Sticking to the idea of a 'one-size-fits-all' approach has led to the inappropriate administration of antibiotics resulting in augmentation of antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are the natural host defense peptides that have gained attention in the field of AMR, and recently, synthetic AMPs are well studied to overcome the drawbacks of natural counterparts. This review deals with the novel techniques utilizing the bacteriolytic activity of natural AMPs. The effective localization of these peptides onto the negatively charged bacterial surface by using nanocarriers and structurally nanoengineered antimicrobial peptide polymers (SNAPPs) owing to its smaller size and better antimicrobial activity is also described here.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBacteriaCross InfectionDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansNanostructuresPolymersPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesPolymersPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsAntimicrobial peptidesAntimicrobial resistanceESKAPE pathogensNanostructured antimicrobial peptidesStructurally nanoengineered antimicrobial peptide polymers (SNAPPs)

Identifiers

PMID32737599
PMCPMC7395033
OpenAlexW3046473440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.