ArticleJournal of medical systems2020
Medical Decision Support to Reduce Unwarranted Methylene Tetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) Genetic Testing.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- MTHFR genetic testing: is there a clinical utility?Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Article
- Laboratory Demand Management Strategies-An Overview.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most major national medical associations have advised against routine MTHFR testing since at least 2013. However, many providers continue to order this unwarranted genetic test. This study assessed the efficacy of an electronic best practice alert to aid ordering providers. We tracked the rate of MTHFR tests ordered per 1 million patients in the twelve months before and after the implementation of an alert that suggested an alternative test. Associated factors including the ordering department, diagnosis, patient sex, and patient age were also analyzed. Chi square analysis was used to compare the difference between pre- and post-alert test ordering rates. A total of 997 MTHFR analysis were ordered in Southern California Kaiser Permanente from January 2017 through December 2018. Overall, the average MTHFR monthly test ordering rates dropped significantly from 12.93 per million patients in 2017 to 7.08 per million patients in 2018 (p = 0.0056). However, testing rates in children were unchanged and, in some associated diagnoses, such as psychiatric illnesses and neurodevelopmental conditions, the testing rates increased. Recommending an alternate test in lieu of the unwarranted one significantly reduced the overall rate of MTHFR testing. The alert was most effective for specialties and diagnoses where MTHFR was historically medically indicated. This suggests such alerts are an effective intervention that health care systems can implement to serve as an educational update and to reduce unwarranted genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.