ReviewWorld journal of surgery2021
Extent of Lymph Node Dissection for Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Review in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mesenteric Fibrosis in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: a Systematic Review of New Thoughts on Causation and Potential Treatments.Current oncology reports · 2025Pooled it
- Extended D3 Mesenterectomy in Small Bowel Cancer Treatment: Feasibility and Importance for Staging. First Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial.World journal of surgery · 2026Trial
- Surgical management of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours.The British journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Lymphatic and vascular anatomy define surgical principles for bowel-sparing radical treatment of ileal tumors.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Mesenteric sparing approach for advanced nodal extent in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Is there a limit to the vascular resection in order to avoid creating a short small bowel syndrome? An anatomic research study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024Article
- ASO Practice Guidelines Series: Surgical Management of Gastrointestinal (Midgut) Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Review
- Two synchronous primary mesenteric neuroendocrine tumors in a patient: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Survival outcome of local versus radical resection for jejunoileal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a propensity score-matched population-based analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
- Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumours: 10 Years' Experience at a Tertiary Referral Centre.Cancers · 2023Article
- Small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasm: what surgeons want to know.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Review
- Association of lymph node metastases, grade and extent of mesenteric lymph node dissection in locoregional small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors with recurrence-free survival.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2022Article
- How to Select Patients Affected by Neuroendocrine Neoplasms for Surgery.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Patterns of Lymph Node Metastasis and Optimal Surgical Strategy in Small (≤20 mm) Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Diagnostic value of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in small bowel diseases.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of nodal disease remains controversial for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NETs). Debates remain regarding the therapeutic role and extent of routine lymph node dissection (LND) for localized SB-NETs, as well as the need for aggressive resection of advanced loco-regional SB-NETs with mesenteric nodal masses. This review will address these questions regarding lymph node dissection for well-differentiated WHO grade 1 and 2 SB-NETs. In general, the aggressiveness and radicality of resection should be balanced against the length of bowel resected and post-operative functional outcomes. In localized SB-NETs with clinically negative lymph nodes, a nodal harvest of ≥ 8 lymph nodes provides accurate staging, but has not been shown to confer survival benefit. For loco-regional SB-NETs with clinically positive lymph nodes identified on imaging, 4 stages of nodal extent have been described: stage 1 nodes are located near to the intestinal border, stage 2 on arterial branches close to the origin of the SMA, stage 3 along the SMA itself, and stage 4 extend in the retroperitoneum under the pancreatic neck. In SB-NETs, every attempt should be made at resection of the primary tumor and the nodal mesenteric mass for curative-intent management and to prevent debilitating complications from mesenteric fibrosis. A mesenteric-sparing approach is favored to allow for resection for complex proximal nodal masses while preserving intestinal length and function. All patients with SB-NETs with nodal mesenteric mass should be assessed by a surgeon for resection; if deemed unresectable, consideration should be given to assessment in high-volume NETs centres to confirm proximal mesenteric-sparing resection is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.