Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737530›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

Performance of discrete, reciprocal, and cyclic movements of the ipsilesional upper limb in individuals after stroke.

Débora B Carvalho, Sandra M S F Freitas, Flavia A D Alencar, Maria Liliane Silva, Sandra R Alouche

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Débora B CarvalhoMasters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo - UNICID, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475 - Tatuapé, São Paulo, SP, 03071-000, Brazil.
Sandra M S F FreitasMasters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo - UNICID, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475 - Tatuapé, São Paulo, SP, 03071-000, Brazil.
Flavia A D AlencarMasters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo - UNICID, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475 - Tatuapé, São Paulo, SP, 03071-000, Brazil.
Maria Liliane SilvaMasters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo - UNICID, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475 - Tatuapé, São Paulo, SP, 03071-000, Brazil.
Sandra R AloucheMasters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo - UNICID, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475 - Tatuapé, São Paulo, SP, 03071-000, Brazil. salouche@uol.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-0814
Universidade Cidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Nove de Julho · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aiming movements of the upper limbs can be classified either as discrete, or reciprocal, or cyclic. The control of these movements after a stroke can be affected. The aim of this experimental, cross-sectional study was to characterize the performance of these movements after the right and left hemisphere chronic stroke. Thirty-six individuals aged between 40 and 70 years, right-handed, were allocated into three groups (control, right stroke, and left stroke). Participants were asked to perform aiming movements on a tablet. Individuals after stroke performed the tasks only with their ipsilesional limb, while the control group performed movements with both limbs. The reaction and movement times, peak velocity, and the variability and error of the endpoint were analyzed. Individuals after stroke presented a worse performance in all movement classes as expected, but differently depending on the damaged hemisphere. Participants with right hemisphere damage showed larger endpoint errors, while those with left hemisphere damage had longer reaction and movement times. Both differences were seen consistently in discrete and reciprocal, but not in cyclic movements. Cyclic movements presented shorter latencies, were faster, and showed greater endpoint errors when compared to discrete and reciprocal movements. These results suggest that stroke affects differently the performance of discrete and reciprocal movements according to the hemisphere lesion side, but not in cyclic movements. Different levels of motor control among the three classes of movements by the nervous system may justify these results.

Indexed as

Functional LateralityStrokeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedMovementPsychomotor PerformanceUpper ExtremityArmHemispheric specializationPsychomotor performance

Identifiers

PMID32737530
OpenAlexW3046760812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.