Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737424›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparison of bacterial communities between midgut and midgut contents in two silkworms, Antheraea pernyi and Bombyx mori.

Huan Wang, Jing-Yu Zhang, Xiao-Meng Wang, Hua-Lei Hu, Run-Xi Xia, Qun Li, Xu-Wei Zhu, Tian-Mao Wang, Yan-Qun Liu, Li Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Huan Wang *Department of Sericulture, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dongling Road, Shenyang, 110866, China.
Jing-Yu Zhang *Department of Sericulture, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dongling Road, Shenyang, 110866, China.
Xiao-Meng Wang *Department of Sericulture, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dongling Road, Shenyang, 110866, China.
Hua-Lei HuDepartment of Sericulture, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dongling Road, Shenyang, 110866, China.
Run-Xi XiaDepartment of Sericulture, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dongling Road, Shenyang, 110866, China.
Qun LiDepartment of Sericulture, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dongling Road, Shenyang, 110866, China.
Xu-Wei ZhuHenan Sericultural Research Institute, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Tian-Mao WangHeilongjiang Sericultural Research Institute, Ha'erbin, 150086, China.
Yan-Qun LiuDepartment of Sericulture, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dongling Road, Shenyang, 110866, China. liuyanqun@syau.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9025-1986
Li QinDepartment of Sericulture, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dongling Road, Shenyang, 110866, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial communities living inside the midgut of insects have been attracting increasing interest. Previous studies have shown that both the midgut and midgut contents harbor bacterial communities. However, whether the bacterial communities of the insect midgut are similar to those of the insect midgut contents (including the peritrophic membrane, food particles, and digestive fluids secreted by the midgut in this study) remains unknown. In the present study, we analyzed two economically important silkworms, the Chinese oak silkworm Antheraea pernyi (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) and the mulberry silkworm Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae), through Illumina MiSeq technology to address this issue. In A. pernyi larvae, 17 phyla and 162 genera were found in the midgut, while 7 phyla and 36 genera were found in the midgut contents. For B. mori larvae, 30 phyla and 465 genera were found in the midgut, but 22 phyla and 344 genera were found in the midgut contents. This evidence from the two silkworms suggests that the bacterial composition and diversity in the midgut are more diverse than those in the midgut contents. Principal component analysis revealed a significant difference in the bacterial community structure between the midgut and midgut contents of B. mori. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the bacterial communities between the midgut and midgut contents in insects, and the results will provide useful information for probing the functional differentiation within the midgut in the future.

Indexed as

BacteriaAnimalsBombyxGastrointestinal MicrobiomeSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32737424
PMCPMC7395759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.