Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737420›Full record

Trial reportProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2021

Cardiac biomarkers in patients with prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease receiving gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist vs antagonist.

David Margel, Yaara Ber, Avivit Peer, Liat Shavit-Grievink, Jehonathan H Pinthus, Guy Witberg, Jack Baniel, Daniel Kedar, Eli Rosenbaum

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David MargelDivision of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel. sdmargel@gmail.com.
Yaara BerDivision of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Avivit PeerDepartment of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Liat Shavit-GrievinkDivision of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Jehonathan H PinthusDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Guy WitbergDepartment of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Jack BanielDivision of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Daniel KedarDivision of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Eli RosenbaumDavidoff Cancer Centre, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Rabin Medical Center · ILMcMaster University · CARambam Health Care Campus · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists reduce testosterone levels for the treatment of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and CV disease (CVD), especially in patients with preexisting CVD treated with GnRH agonists. Here, we investigated the potential relationship between serum levels of the cardiac biomarkers N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), D-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), and high-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) and the risk of new CV events in prostate cancer patients with a history of CVD receiving a GnRH agonist or antagonist.

methodsPost-hoc analyses were performed of a phase II randomized study that prospectively assessed CV events in patients with prostate cancer and preexisting CVD, receiving GnRH agonist or antagonist. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine whether the selected biomarkers had any predictive effect on CV events at baseline and across a 12-month treatment period.

resultsBaseline and disease characteristics of the 80 patients who took part in the study were well balanced between treatment arms. Ischemic heart disease (66%) and myocardial infarction (37%) were the most common prior CVD and the majority (92%) of patients received CV medication. We found that high levels of NTproBNP (p = 0.008), and hsTn (p = 0.004) at baseline were associated with the development of new CV events in the GnRH agonist group but not in the antagonist. In addition, a nonsignificant trend was observed between higher levels of NTproBNP over time and the development of new CV events in the GnRH agonist group.

conclusionsThe use of cardiac biomarkers may be worthy of further study as tools in the prediction of CV risk in prostate cancer patients receiving ADT. Analysis was limited by the small sample size; larger studies are required to validate biomarker use to predict CV events among patients receiving ADT.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsFollow-Up StudiesGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansMaleMyocardiumNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsProstatic NeoplasmsTroponinBiomarkersFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Troponin

Identifiers

PMID32737420
PMCPMC8012206
OpenAlexW3046907373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.