Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737395›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2020

Visualizing drug binding interactions using microcrystal electron diffraction.

Max T B Clabbers, S Zoë Fisher, Mathieu Coinçon, Xiaodong Zou, Hongyi Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Combining MicroED and native mass spectrometry for structural discovery of enzyme-small molecule complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fragment-based drug discovery: A graphical review.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  7. MicroED in drug discovery.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Macromolecular crystallography using microcrystal electron diffraction.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Max T B ClabbersDepartment of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5466-6508
S Zoë FisherEuropean Spallation Source ERIC, 224 84, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-0269
Mathieu CoinçonDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Xiaodong ZouDepartment of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6748-6656
Hongyi XuDepartment of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden. hongyi.xu@mmk.su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8271-3906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visualizing ligand binding interactions is important for structure-based drug design and fragment-based screening methods. Rapid and uniform soaking with potentially reduced lattice defects make small macromolecular crystals attractive targets for studying drug binding using microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED). However, so far no drug binding interactions could unambiguously be resolved by electron diffraction alone. Here, we use MicroED to study the binding of a sulfonamide inhibitor to human carbonic anhydrase isoform II (HCA II). We show that MicroED data can efficiently be collected on a conventional transmission electron microscope from thin hydrated microcrystals soaked with the clinical drug acetazolamide (AZM). The data are of high enough quality to unequivocally fit and resolve the bound inhibitor. We anticipate MicroED can play an important role in facilitating in-house fragment screening for drug discovery, complementing existing methods in structural biology such as X-ray and neutron diffraction.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionAcetazolamideCarbonic Anhydrase IICarrier ProteinsCrystallography, X-RayElectronsHumansLigandsNerve Tissue ProteinsPharmaceutical PreparationsAcetazolamideCA2 protein, humanCarbonic Anhydrase IICarrier ProteinsLigandsNerve Tissue ProteinsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID32737395
PMCPMC7395157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.