Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737353›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A footprint of plant eco-geographic adaptation on the composition of the barley rhizosphere bacterial microbiota.

Rodrigo Alegria Terrazas, Katharin Balbirnie-Cumming, Jenny Morris, Pete E Hedley, Joanne Russell, Eric Paterson, Elizabeth M Baggs, Eyal Fridman, Davide Bulgarelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Plant influence shapesMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Allelopathic Effects ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigo Alegria TerrazasPlant Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Katharin Balbirnie-CummingPlant Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Jenny MorrisCell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, UK.
Pete E HedleyCell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, UK.
Joanne RussellCell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, UK.
Eric PatersonEcological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, UK.
Elizabeth M BaggsGlobal Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Eyal FridmanInstitute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel.
Davide BulgarelliPlant Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. d.bulgarelli@dundee.ac.uk.
James Hutton Institute · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBAgricultural Research Organization · ILUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiota thriving in the rhizosphere, the thin layer of soil surrounding plant roots, plays a critical role in plant's adaptation to the environment. Domestication and breeding selection have progressively differentiated the microbiota of modern crops from the ones of their wild ancestors. However, the impact of eco-geographical constraints faced by domesticated plants and crop wild relatives on recruitment and maintenance of the rhizosphere microbiota remains to be fully elucidated. Here we performed a comparative 16S rRNA gene survey of the rhizosphere of 4 domesticated and 20 wild barley (Hordeum vulgare) genotypes grown in an agricultural soil under controlled environmental conditions. We demonstrated the enrichment of individual bacteria mirrored the distinct eco-geographical constraints faced by their host plants. Unexpectedly, Elite varieties exerted a stronger genotype effect on the rhizosphere microbiota when compared with wild barley genotypes adapted to desert environments with a preferential enrichment for members of Actinobacteria. Finally, in wild barley genotypes, we discovered a limited, but significant, correlation between microbiota diversity and host genomic diversity. Our results revealed a footprint of the host's adaptation to the environment on the assembly of the bacteria thriving at the root-soil interface. In the tested conditions, this recruitment cue layered atop of the distinct evolutionary trajectories of wild and domesticated plants and, at least in part, is encoded by the barley genome. This knowledge will be critical to design experimental approaches aimed at elucidating the recruitment cues of the barley microbiota across a range of soil types.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaCrops, AgriculturalHordeumPlant RootsRhizosphereMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID32737353
PMCPMC7395104
OpenAlexW3046315893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.