Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737305›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Assessing the response of micro-eukaryotic diversity to the Great Acceleration using lake sedimentary DNA.

François Keck, Laurent Millet, Didier Debroas, David Etienne, Didier Galop, Damien Rius, Isabelle Domaizon

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

François KeckINRAE, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CARRTEL, 74200, Thonon-les-Bains, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3323-4167
Laurent MilletCNRS, Chrono Environnement, 25000, Besançon, France.
Didier DebroasUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Laboratoire Microorganismes: Genome et Environnement, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
David EtiennePole R&D ECLA, CARRTEL, 74200, Thonon-les-Bains, France.
Didier GalopGEODE UMR 5602 CNRS, Université de Toulouse, 31058, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1746-4760
Damien RiusCNRS, Chrono Environnement, 25000, Besançon, France.
Isabelle DomaizonINRAE, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CARRTEL, 74200, Thonon-les-Bains, France. isabelle.domaizon@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9785-3082
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term time series have provided evidence that anthropogenic pressures can threaten lakes. Yet it remains unclear how and the extent to which lake biodiversity has changed during the Anthropocene, in particular for microbes. Here, we used DNA preserved in sediments to compare modern micro-eukaryotic communities with those from the end of the 19th century, i.e., before acceleration of the human imprint on ecosystems. Our results obtained for 48 lakes indicate drastic changes in the composition of microbial communities, coupled with a homogenization of their diversity between lakes. Remote high elevation lakes were globally less impacted than lowland lakes affected by local human activity. All functional groups (micro-algae, parasites, saprotrophs and consumers) underwent significant changes in diversity. However, we show that the effects of anthropogenic changes have benefited in particular phototrophic and mixotrophic species, which is consistent with the hypothesis of a global increase of primary productivity in lakes.

Indexed as

AlveolataBiodiversityBiological EvolutionDNAEcosystemEukaryotaGeologic SedimentsHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHuman ActivitiesHumansLakesMicroalgaeMicrobiotaPhototrophic ProcessesDNA

Identifiers

PMID32737305
PMCPMC7395174
OpenAlexW3046545998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.