Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32737276›Full record

ReviewIET systems biology2020

Review of tools and algorithms for network motif discovery in biological networks.

Sabyasachi Patra, Anjali Mohapatra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IET systems biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Motif discovery in hospital ward vital signs observation networks.Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  5. Complex Prediction in Large PPI Networks Using Expansion and Stripe of Core Cliques.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sabyasachi PatraDepartment of Computer Science, IIIT Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. sabyasachi@iiit-bh.ac.in.
Anjali MohapatraDepartment of Computer Science, IIIT Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network motifs are recurrent and over-represented patterns having biological relevance. This is one of the important local properties of biological networks. Network motif discovery finds important applications in many areas such as functional analysis of biological components, the validity of network composition, classification of networks, disease discovery, identification of unique subunits etc. The discovery of network motifs is a computationally challenging task due to the large size of real networks, and the exponential increase of search space with respect to network size and motif size. This problem also includes the subgraph isomorphism check, which is Nondeterministic Polynomial (NP)-complete. Several tools and algorithms have been designed in the last few years to address this problem with encouraging results. These tools and algorithms can be classified into various categories based on exact census, mapping, pattern growth, and so on. In this study, critical aspects of network motif discovery, design principles of background algorithms, and their functionality have been reviewed with their strengths and limitations. The performances of state-of-art algorithms are discussed in terms of runtime efficiency, scalability, and space requirement. The future scope, research direction, and challenges of the existing algorithms are presented at the end of the study.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksHumansModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID32737276
PMCPMC8687426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.